Paper · 1992 · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research

The effect of dwarfing genes in spring wheat in dry environments. I. Agronomic characteristics

RA Richards

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
191
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Near-isogenic lines of wheat were used to investigate the possible yield penalty of dwarfing genes in rainfed environments. Field experiments were conducted over seven years in south-eastern Australia which were characterized by drought becoming progressively more intense as crop maturity approached. Isogenic sets for the Rht1 and Rht2 genes were chosen to cover a range of heights for the tall (rhtrht) lines, from 100 to 130 cm when grown in the absence of drought before anthesis. Rht1 or Rht2 reduced this height by about 23% whereas Rht1 and Rht2 together or Rht3 alone reduced this ceiling height by about 47%. Highest grain yields were achieved by lines with a height between 70 and 100 cm. Although major were usually required to achieve this optimum height, no specific advantage of the major dwarfing genes was found. Likewise, in tall and short isogenic populations, the short populations yielded more than the tall populations even though they all contained Rht1. The expression of the major dwarfing genes and their effect on agronomic characteristics varied depending on the genetic background but general trends were evident. Above-ground dry weight was reduced by 4.4% of the mean weight for each 10 cm reduction in height below 100 cm. Above 100 cm there was little change in above-ground dry weight. Harvest index decreased by 3.7% of the mean value for each 10 cm increase in height above 65 cm. When height was less than 65 cm, harvest index remained constant. Kernel number was more sensitive to variation in height than was kernel weight. In only one of the isogenic sets was there evidence for compensation between kernel number and kernel weight; in four sets, both kernel number and kernel weight matched variation in yield in a positive way.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rht1 or Rht2 reduced height about 23%.

Treatment
Rht1 or Rht2e0
Outcome
heighte0
Direction
reducede0
Value
about 23%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rht1 or Rht2 reduced this height by about 23%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–531 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rht1 and Rht2 together or Rht3 alone reduced height about 47%.

Treatment
Rht1 and Rht2 together or Rht3 alonee0
Outcome
ceiling heighte0
Direction
reducede0
Value
about 47%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rht1 and Rht2 together or Rht3 alone reduced this ceiling height by about 47%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–617 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–44 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highest grain yields occurred at 70 to 100 cm height.

Material
linese0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
Higheste0
Qualifier
between 70 and 100 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest grain yields were achieved by lines with a height between 70 and 100 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–698 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Major dwarfing genes had no specific advantage.

Outcome
advantage of the major dwarfing genese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no specific advantage of the major dwarfing genes was found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–828 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Short isogenic populations yielded more than tall ones.

Material
short populationse0
Outcome
yieldede0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
tall populationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the short populations yielded more than the tall populations even though they all contained Rht1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–976 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–44 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aboveground dry weight fell 4.4% for each 10 cm decrease below 100 cm.

Organ / stage
heighte0
Outcome
Above-ground dry weighte0
Direction
reducede0
Value
4.4%e0
Qualifier
for each 10 cm reduction in height below 100 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Above-ground dry weight was reduced by 4.4% of the mean weight for each 10 cm reduction in height below 100 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1253 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Above 100 cm, aboveground dry weight changed little.

Outcome
above-ground dry weighte0
Direction
little changee0
Qualifier
Above 100 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Above 100 cm there was little change in above-ground dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1318 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–44 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest index fell 3.7% for each 10 cm height increase above 65 cm.

Organ / stage
heighte0
Outcome
Harvest indexe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
3.7%e0
Qualifier
for each 10 cm increase in height above 65 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Harvest index decreased by 3.7% of the mean value for each 10 cm increase in height above 65 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1415 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–44 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest index remained constant below 65 cm.

Organ / stage
heighte0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
remained constante0
Qualifier
less than 65 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When height was less than 65 cm, harvest index remained constant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1417–1481 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–44 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kernel number was more sensitive to height than kernel weight.

Organ / stage
heighte0
Outcome
Kernel numbere0
Direction
more sensitivee0
Comparator
kernel weighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Kernel number was more sensitive to variation in height than was kernel weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1483–1561 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One isogenic set showed compensation between kernel number and weight.

Material
isogenic setse0
Outcome
compensation between kernel number and kernel weighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In only one of the isogenic sets was there evidence for compensation between kernel number and kernel weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1563–1671 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–44 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In four sets, both kernel number and weight varied positively with yield.

Material
setse0
Outcome
kernel number and kernel weighte0
Direction
positivee0
Qualifier
variation in yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in four sets, both kernel number and kernel weight matched variation in yield in a positive way”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1673–1768 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–44 · show in text ↑