Paper · 2009 · TURKISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY

Long-term effects of crop rotation and fertilizers on weed community in spring barley

H. R. MOHAMMADDOUST CHAMANABAD; A. GHORBANI; ALI ASGHARI; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
21
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Integrated weed management programs require a clear understanding of the mechanisms influencing the establishment, growth, and reproduction of unwanted plants (weeds) in agro-ecosystems. This study evaluates the effect of long-term (95 years after the establishment of the site) crop rotation and chemical fertilizers on the weed community dynamics in spring barley at the Agricultural University of Timiriazev, Agricultural Site in Moscow. The weed community occurring on plots of spring barley (grown in crop rotation or continuous) was examined under nitrogen, potassium, phosphorus, NPK, and a control with no fertilizer treatments. Statistical analyses were conducted using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and principal component analysis (PCA). The results show that a) at the study sites, spring weeds are dominant components on agro-ecosystems; b) weed density, particularly of perennials, has significantly decreased under crop rotation; c) the combination of fertilizers (NPK) also decreased the weed density, d) weed density under separate N, P, and K applications was almost the same as that in the control plots. These results suggest that long-term crop rotation and NPK application can strongly affect and reduce weed density in spring barley.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring weeds dominated the studied agroecosystems.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Interactor
spring weedse0weed
Outcome
spring weeds are dominant componentse0
Setting
the study sitese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at the study sites, spring weeds are dominant components on agro-ecosystems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–848 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop rotation significantly decreased weed density, particularly perennial weeds.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
crop rotatione0
Interactor
perennialse0weed
Outcome
weed density, particularly of perennialse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed density, particularly of perennials, has significantly decreased under crop rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–942 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined NPK fertilizers decreased weed density.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
combination of fertilizers (NPK)e0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination of fertilizers (NPK) also decreased the weed density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1015 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Separate N, P, and K applications yielded weed density almost the same as controls.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
separate N, P, and K applicationse0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
almost the samee0
Comparator
control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed density under separate N, P, and K applications was almost the same as that in the control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1121 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–85 · show in text ↑

rotation · weed · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
    Crop rotations and repeated barley cultivation did not differentiate weed taxonomic biodiversity.

    Taxonomic diversity and distinctness indices in assessment of weed communities · 2012 · compared with growing spring barley once and twice after the same barley crop

    No difference from an alternative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

nitrogen · weed · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 4 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

fertilization · weed · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 9 positive, 5 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.