Abstract
In vitro propagation of grapevine was studied by using axillary buds of the promising grapevine cultivars, ‘Marechal Foch’ and ‘Lacrosse’. The medium (MS and NN) and cytokinin treatments (BA, TDZ, and 2iP) in combination with IBA were found to differently affect the success of micropropagation of these cultivars. For both cultivars, MS medium was superior to NN medium for leaf and shoot formation from axillary buds. The best shoot and leaf formation was obtained with 2iP at 12.3μM and 24.6μM and BA at 8.88μM in MS medium for ‘Marechal Foch’. However, 2iP at 24.6μM in either medium, 2iP at 12.3μM in NN medium and BA at 8.88μM in MS medium showed the best performance for ‘Lacrosse’. For root formation, with the exception of 2iP, all cytokinins exhibited inhibitory effects on root development for both cultivars. In general, ‘Marechal Foch’ seemed more amenable to propagation in vitro than ‘Lacrosse’.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
MS medium outperformed NN medium for leaf and shoot formation in both cultivars.
- Organ / stage
- axillary budse0
- Treatment
- MS mediume0
- Outcome
- leaf and shoot formatione0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Comparator
- NN mediume0
VitisOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“For both cultivars, MS medium was superior to NN medium for leaf and shoot formation from axillary buds.”
t0“Grapevine (VitisSpp.)”
Claim · model-written summary
For Marechal Foch, 2iP at two concentrations and BA in MS medium gave the best shoot and leaf formation.
- Material
- ‘Marechal Foch’e0
- Treatment
- 2iP at 12.3μM and 24.6μM and BA at 8.88μM in MS mediume0
- Outcome
- shoot and leaf formatione0
- Direction
- beste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The best shoot and leaf formation was obtained with 2iP at 12.3μM and 24.6μM and BA at 8.88μM in MS medium for ‘Marechal Foch’.”
t0“Grapevine (VitisSpp.)”
Claim · model-written summary
For Lacrosse, specified 2iP and BA medium combinations performed best.
- Material
- ‘Lacrosse’e0
- Treatment
- 2iP at 24.6μM in either medium, 2iP at 12.3μM in NN medium and BA at 8.88μM in MS mediume0
- Outcome
- best performancee0
- Direction
- best performancee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“2iP at 24.6μM in either medium, 2iP at 12.3μM in NN medium and BA at 8.88μM in MS medium showed the best performance for ‘Lacrosse’.”
t0“Grapevine (VitisSpp.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Except for 2iP, cytokinins inhibited root development in both cultivars.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“with the exception of 2iP, all cytokinins exhibited inhibitory effects on root development for both cultivars”
t0“Grapevine (VitisSpp.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Marechal Foch appeared more amenable to in vitro propagation than Lacrosse.
- Material
- ‘Marechal Foch’e0
- Outcome
- propagation in vitroe0
- Direction
- more amenablee0
- Comparator
- ‘Lacrosse’e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“‘Marechal Foch’ seemed more amenable to propagation in vitro than ‘Lacrosse’”
t0“Grapevine (VitisSpp.)”
The same questions in other papers
class · growth · VitisPositive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
23 papers more in this group
See all 27 papers →in vitro · growth · VitisPositive and negative results
46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
50 papers more in this group
See all 54 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.