Paper · 2010 · Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences

Responses of Different Wheat Genotypes to Drought Stress Applied at Different Growth Stages

M.H. Sangtarash

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
49
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Environmental stress especially drought stress can play an important role in the reduction of plant growth and development. In order to study the effects of drought stress on different growth stages of wheat, an experiment was conducted with five Iranian variety included Atrak, Red-Seed, Cross-Flat, Hirmand and Darab. A split plot design was used with drought treatment being the main plot and cultivar the subplot with three replications. Poorest yield were when drought stress was applied at flowering. It was shown that the most sensitive crop stage in terms of the total number of spikelets is at early stem elongation. Onset of the drought stress at flowering had the greatest damaging effect on seeds per spikelet. The most damaging to seed size was drought stresses applied at and just after flowering. Significant interactions occurred because Darab the highest yielding cultivar and Red-Seed the lowest yielding cultivar both showed an equal and great reduction in seed size under the drought stress while Hirmand was much less responsive. Morphological characters are likely to be affected by water stress. The results of this study indicate that if water for irrigation is scarce and needs to be conserve any saving should not be at the risk of causing drought stress around anthesis. Hirmand, while not the highest yielding cultivar is more stable over the range of moisture stresses applied and it could be considered as a parent to combine its stability with the higher yield potential of say, Darab.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought applied at flowering produced the poorest wheat yield.

Treatment
drought stress was applied at floweringe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
Pooreste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Poorest yield were when drought stress was applied at flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–505 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The wheat spikelet count was most sensitive to drought at early stem elongation.

Organ / stage
early stem elongatione0
Outcome
total number of spikeletse0
Direction
most sensitivee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the most sensitive crop stage in terms of the total number of spikelets is at early stem elongation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–624 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought beginning at flowering had the greatest damaging effect on wheat seeds per spikelet.

Treatment
drought stress at floweringe0
Outcome
seeds per spikelete0
Direction
greatest damaging effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Onset of the drought stress at flowering had the greatest damaging effect on seeds per spikelet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–721 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought at and just after flowering caused the greatest damage to wheat seed size.

Treatment
drought stresses applied at and just after floweringe0
Outcome
seed sizee0
Direction
most damaginge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most damaging to seed size was drought stresses applied at and just after flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–810 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–38 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Darab had the highest yield among the tested wheat cultivars.

Material
Darabe0
Outcome
highest yieldinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Darab the highest yielding cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–889 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–38 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red-Seed had the lowest yield among the tested wheat cultivars.

Material
Red-Seede0
Outcome
lowest yieldinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Red-Seed the lowest yielding cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–931 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Darab seed size declined greatly under drought.

Material
Darabe0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
seed sizee0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant interactions occurred because Darab the highest yielding cultivar and Red-Seed the lowest yielding cultivar both showed an equal and great reduction in seed size under the drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–1010 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Red-Seed seed size declined greatly under drought.

Material
Red-Seede0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
seed sizee0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant interactions occurred because Darab the highest yielding cultivar and Red-Seed the lowest yielding cultivar both showed an equal and great reduction in seed size under the drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–1010 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hirmand seed size responded much less to drought than Darab and Red-Seed.

Material
Hirmande0
Treatment
drought stresse1
Outcome
responsivee0
Direction
much lesse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while Hirmand was much less responsive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1049 · show in text ↑
e1

“under the drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1010 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–38 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors advise avoiding drought around anthesis when conserving irrigation water.

Outcome
any saving should not be at the risk of causing drought stress around anthesise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“if water for irrigation is scarce and needs to be conserve any saving should not be at the risk of causing drought stress around anthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1296 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–38 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest Hirmand as a breeding parent to combine drought stability with Darab yield potential.

Material
Hirmande0
Outcome
considered as a parente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hirmand, while not the highest yielding cultivar is more stable over the range of moisture stresses applied and it could be considered as a parent to combine its stability with the higher yield potential of say, Darab”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1515 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–38 · show in text ↑

stage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

160 papers: 95 positive, 65 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

156 papers more in this group

See all 160 papers →

drought · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

632 papers: 95 positive, 537 negative or no effect

536 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

628 papers more in this group

See all 632 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.