Paper · 2004 · Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Analysis of the Endophytic Actinobacterial Population in the Roots of Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) by Terminal Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism and Sequencing of 16S rRNA Clones

Vanessa M. Conn; Christopher M. M. Franco

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
190
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The endophytic actinobacterial population in the roots of wheat grown in three different soils obtained from the southeast part of South Australia was investigated by terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis of the amplified 16S rRNA genes. A new, validated approach was applied to the T-RFLP analysis in order to estimate, to the genus level, the actinobacterial population that was identified. Actinobacterium-biased primers were used together with three restriction enzymes to obtain terminal restriction fragments (TRFs). The TRFs were matched to bacterial genera by the T-RFLP Analysis Program, and the data were analyzed to validate and semiquantify the genera present within the plant roots. The highest diversity and level of endophytic colonization were found in the roots of wheat grown in a dark loam from Swedes Flat, and the lowest were found in water-repellent sand from Western Flat. This molecular approach detected a greater diversity of actinobacteria than did previous culture-dependent methods, with the predominant genera being Mycobacterium (21.02%) in Swedes Flat, Streptomyces (14.35%) in Red Loam, and Kitasatospora (15.02%) in Western Flat. This study indicates that the soil that supported a higher number of indigenous organisms resulted in wheat roots with higher actinobacterial diversity and levels of colonization within the plant tissue. Sequencing of 16S rRNA clones, obtained using the same actinobacterium-biased PCR primers that were used in the T-RFLP analysis, confirmed the presence of the actinobacterial diversity and identified a number of Mycobacterium and Streptomyces species.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat roots in dark loam from Swedes Flat had the greatest endophyte diversity and colonization.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
diversity and level of endophytic colonizatione0
Direction
higheste0
Setting
Swedes Flate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest diversity and level of endophytic colonization were found in the roots of wheat grown in a dark loam from Swedes Flat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–855 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat roots in water-repellent sand from Western Flat had the lowest endophyte diversity and colonization.

Outcome
the loweste0
Setting
Western Flate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest were found in water-repellent sand from Western Flat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–924 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T-RFLP detected more actinobacterial diversity than prior culture methods.

Outcome
diversity of actinobacteriae0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
previous culture-dependent methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This molecular approach detected a greater diversity of actinobacteria than did previous culture-dependent methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1040 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycobacterium was predominant at Swedes Flat at 21.02%.

Interactor
MycobacteriumMycobacteriume0symbiont
Outcome
predominant generae0
Value
21.02%e0
Setting
Swedes Flate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Mycobacterium
Mycobacterium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the predominant genera being Mycobacterium (21.02%) in Swedes Flat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1113 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Streptomyces was predominant in Red Loam at 14.35%.

Interactor
StreptomycesStreptomycese0symbiont
Outcome
Streptomycese0
Value
14.35%e0
Setting
Red Loame0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Streptomyces
Streptomyces · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Streptomyces (14.35%) in Red Loam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1148 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kitasatospora was predominant in Western Flat at 15.02%.

Interactor
KitasatosporaKitasatosporae0symbiont
Outcome
Kitasatosporae0
Value
15.02%e0
Setting
Western Flate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Kitasatospora
Kitasatospora · InteractorAgricultural Research Service (NRRL)Culture Collection · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Kitasatospora (15.02%) in Western Flat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1192 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soils with more indigenous organisms supported wheat roots with greater actinobacterial diversity and colonization.

Outcome
actinobacterial diversity and levels of colonizatione0
Direction
highere0
Setting
soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil that supported a higher number of indigenous organisms resulted in wheat roots with higher actinobacterial diversity and levels of colonization within the plant tissue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1396 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

16S clone sequencing confirmed actinobacterial diversity and identified Mycobacterium and Streptomyces species.

Outcome
presence of the actinobacterial diversitye0
Comparator
T-RFLP analysise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sequencing of 16S rRNA clones, obtained using the same actinobacterium-biased PCR primers that were used in the T-RFLP analysis, confirmed the presence of the actinobacterial diversity and identified a number of Mycobacterium and Streptomyces species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1398–1648 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑