Paper · 1995 · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture

Production practices for high protein, hard wheat in Western Australia

WK Anderson; GB Crosbie; K Lemsom

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
30
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted at 18 sites over 4 years in the eastern and north-eastern wheatbelt of Western Australia where average annual rainfall is <400mm, to investigate suitable techniques for the production of high protein (>13%) wheat in an area that traditionally produces grain of a much lower average protein percentage. Wilgoyne yielded as well as, or better than, any of the cultivars accepted into the Special Hard (SH) grade in Western Australia but 5-10% less than cultivars suitable for the Australian Standard White (ASW) grade. Differences between cultivars were greatest at the optimum sowing time in late May. Lower yields in early May were attributed to water stress during early growth or to frost damage during grain filling. The addition of nitrogen (N) fertiliser to crops sown after 1 June was less effective in increasing grain yield and grain protein than N added to earlier sowings. Most crops that produced >13% protein followed medic or field peas. The addition of N fertiliser was seldom required to produce this concentration of protein in crops that followed medic or peas. Crops following pasture with a low legume content or wheat had lower grain protein concentrations. Friable red-brown earth soils in a medic or pea rotation were able to achieve the required grain protein, but other combinations were not extensively tested. From these experiments, cultivars with inherently small grains due to their propensity to produce high levels of small grain screenings (whole grain through a 2-mm, slotted sieve) may be less able to increase yields economically by increasing kernel numbers per unit area under conditions in Western Australia.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wilgoyne yielded at least as well as Special Hard cultivars.

Material
Wilgoynee0
Outcome
yielded as well as, or better thane0
Comparator
cultivars accepted into the Special Hard (SH) gradee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wilgoyne yielded as well as, or better than, any of the cultivars accepted into the Special Hard (SH) grade in Western Australia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–463 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wilgoyne yielded 5–10% less than ASW cultivars.

Material
Wilgoynee1
Outcome
5-10% lesse0
Value
5-10%e0
Comparator
cultivars suitable for the Australian Standard White (ASW) gradee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but 5-10% less than cultivars suitable for the Australian Standard White (ASW) grade.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–549 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–49 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wilgoyne yielded as well as, or better than, any of the cultivars accepted into the Special Hard (SH) grade in Western Australia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–463 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar differences were greatest at late May sowing.

Treatment
late Maye0
Outcome
Differences between cultivarse0
Direction
greateste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Differences between cultivars were greatest at the optimum sowing time in late May.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–633 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early May sowing produced lower yields.

Treatment
early Maye0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
Lowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lower yields in early May were attributed to water stress during early growth or to frost damage during grain filling.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–752 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen added after June 1 was less effective for grain yield than earlier application.

Treatment
nitrogen (N) fertiliser to crops sown after 1 Junee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
less effective in increasinge0
Comparator
N added to earlier sowingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of nitrogen (N) fertiliser to crops sown after 1 June was less effective in increasing grain yield and grain protein than N added to earlier sowings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–915 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen added after June 1 was less effective for grain protein than earlier application.

Treatment
nitrogen (N) fertiliser to crops sown after 1 Junee0
Outcome
grain proteine0
Direction
less effective in increasinge0
Comparator
N added to earlier sowingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of nitrogen (N) fertiliser to crops sown after 1 June was less effective in increasing grain yield and grain protein than N added to earlier sowings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–915 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most crops exceeding 13% protein followed medic or field peas.

Treatment
medic or field pease0
Outcome
>13% proteine0
Value
>13%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Most crops that produced >13% protein followed medic or field peas.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–983 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen was seldom required to reach that protein concentration after medic or peas.

Treatment
N fertilisere0
Outcome
this concentration of proteine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of N fertiliser was seldom required to produce this concentration of protein in crops that followed medic or peas.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1111 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crops after low legume pasture or wheat had lower grain protein.

Treatment
pasture with a low legume content or wheate0
Outcome
grain protein concentrationse0
Direction
lowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crops following pasture with a low legume content or wheat had lower grain protein concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1210 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Friable red brown soils with medic or pea rotation reached the protein target.

Treatment
medic or pea rotatione0
Outcome
required grain proteine0
Setting
Friable red-brown earth soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Friable red-brown earth soils in a medic or pea rotation were able to achieve the required grain protein”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1315 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–49 · show in text ↑