Paper · 2005 · The Plant Journal

Virus‐induced gene silencing in tomato fruit

Da‐Qi Fu; Ben‐Zhong Zhu; Hong‐Liang Zhu; et al.

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
362
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) is a powerful tool for the study of gene function in plants. Here we report that either by syringe-infiltrating the tobacco rattle virus (TRV)-vector into the surface, stem or carpopodium of a tomato fruit attached to the plant or by vacuum-infiltrating into a tomato fruit detached from the plant, TRV can efficiently spread and replicate in the tomato fruit. Although VIGS can be performed in tomato fruit by all of the means mentioned above, the most effective method is to inject the TRV-vector into the carpopodium of young fruit attached to the plant about 10 days after pollination. Several reporter genes related to ethylene responses and fruit ripening, including LeCTR1 and LeEILs genes, were also successfully silenced by this method during fruit development. In addition, we found that the silencing of the LeEIN2 gene results in the suppression of tomato fruit ripening. The results of our study indicate that the application of VIGS techniques by the described methods can be successfully applied to tomato fruit and is a valuable tool for studying functions of the relevant genes during fruit developing.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TRV spread and replicated efficiently in tomato fruit after syringe or vacuum infiltration.

Organ / stage
fruite0
Treatment
tobacco rattle virus (TRV)-vectore0
Interactor
tobacco rattle virusTobacco rattle viruse0pathogen
Outcome
TRV can efficiently spread and replicate in the tomato fruite0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“either by syringe-infiltrating the tobacco rattle virus (TRV)-vector into the surface, stem or carpopodium of a tomato fruit attached to the plant or by vacuum-infiltrating into a tomato fruit detached from the plant, TRV can efficiently spread and replicate in the tomato fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–395 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carpopodium injection of young attached tomato fruit around 10 days after pollination was the most effective VIGS method.

Organ / stage
young fruite0
Treatment
inject the TRV-vector into the carpopodiume0
Outcome
the most effective methode0
Qualifier
about 10 days after pollinatione0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the most effective method is to inject the TRV-vector into the carpopodium of young fruit attached to the plant about 10 days after pollination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–624 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–44 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LeCTR1 was successfully silenced during fruit development.

Organ / stage
fruite0
Gene
LeCTR1e0
Outcome
successfully silencede0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“including LeCTR1 and LeEILs genes, were also successfully silenced by this method during fruit development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–805 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–44 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LeEILs genes were successfully silenced during fruit development.

Organ / stage
fruite0
Gene
LeEILse0
Outcome
successfully silencede0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LeCTR1 and LeEILs genes, were also successfully silenced by this method during fruit development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–805 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silencing LeEIN2 suppressed tomato fruit ripening.

Treatment
silencing of the LeEIN2 genee0
Gene
LeEIN2e0
Outcome
tomato fruit ripeninge0
Direction
suppressione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“silencing of the LeEIN2 gene results in the suppression of tomato fruit ripening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–918 · show in text ↑

loss of function · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 21 positive, 33 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.