Paper · 2010 · AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY

Effects of insecticide spray application on insect pest infestation and yield of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) in the Transkei, South Africa

D Dzemo W; S Niba A; A N Asiwe J

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
26
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Field studies were conducted during the 2008 - 2009 cropping season to determine the minimal insecticide application which can reduce cowpea yield losses on the field due to insect pest infestations in the Transkei region of South Africa. Treatments consisted of five cowpea varieties and four regimes of insecticide spray which were laid out with a split-plot experimental design with four replications. Observations were taken on the incidence of major insect pests, cowpea pod and seed damage by insects as well as growth and yield parameters of the cowpea varieties. Results showed that spray regimes had significant effects on insect population counts, pod and seed damage and consequently on cowpea yield parameters. Application of insecticide once each at flower budding and early podding significantly reduced pod borers and pod-sucking bugs infestations by 44 and 56%, respectively, compared to the untreated control. Application of insecticide, once at flower budding, early podding and pod filling significantly reduced pod and seed damage, resulting in substantial increase in number of pods, pod weight and seed weight per plant, and also number of seeds per pod of cowpea compared to the untreated control. This study provides information on the incidence of major insect pests of cowpea as well as the minimum insecticide control intervention necessary for effectively reducing cowpea yield losses on the field. Two insecticide spray regimes (once at flowering and podding) significantly reduced insect population and damage of cowpea. Key words: Cowpea, insecticide spray, insect pests, yield

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spray regimes significantly affected pest population counts.

Treatment
spray regimese0
Outcome
insect population countse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spray regimes had significant effects on insect population counts, pod and seed damage and consequently on cowpea yield parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–722 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spray regimes significantly affected cowpea pod and seed damage.

Treatment
spray regimese0
Outcome
pod and seed damagee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spray regimes had significant effects on insect population counts, pod and seed damage and consequently on cowpea yield parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–722 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spray regimes significantly affected cowpea yield parameters.

Treatment
spray regimese0
Outcome
yield parameterse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spray regimes had significant effects on insect population counts, pod and seed damage and consequently on cowpea yield parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–722 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying at flower budding and early podding reduced pod borer infestation by 44%.

Treatment
Application of insecticide once each at flower budding and early poddinge0
Outcome
pod borerse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
44e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of insecticide once each at flower budding and early podding significantly reduced pod borers and pod-sucking bugs infestations by 44 and 56%, respectively, compared to the untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–926 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying at flower budding and early podding reduced pod sucking bug infestation by 56%.

Treatment
Application of insecticide once each at flower budding and early poddinge0
Outcome
pod-sucking bugs infestationse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
56%e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of insecticide once each at flower budding and early podding significantly reduced pod borers and pod-sucking bugs infestations by 44 and 56%, respectively, compared to the untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–926 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Three insecticide applications reduced cowpea pod and seed damage.

Treatment
Application of insecticide, once at flower budding, early podding and pod fillinge0
Outcome
pod and seed damagee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of insecticide, once at flower budding, early podding and pod filling significantly reduced pod and seed damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1050 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three insecticide applications increased pods, pod weight, seed weight and seeds per pod compared with untreated cowpea.

Treatment
insecticide spray applicationt0
Outcome
number of pods, pod weight and seed weight per plant, and also number of seeds per pode0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resulting in substantial increase in number of pods, pod weight and seed weight per plant, and also number of seeds per pod of cowpea compared to the untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1220 · show in text ↑
t0

“insecticide spray application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–40 · show in text ↑

insecticide · pest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 23 positive, 1 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

insecticide · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 24 positive, 4 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

application · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

126 papers: 112 positive, 14 negative or no effect

111 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
    The flowerbud and podding spray schedule increased cowpea seed yield as much as fortnightly spraying.

    The effects of different deltamethrin spray schedules on yields and potential seed yields of cowpea at Foumbot, Cameroon · 1993 · compared with spraying plants fortnightly with deltamethrin at the preflowering and reproductive phases of growth

    Same directionCited by this paper

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.