Paper · 2014 · New Phytologist

Effects of virus on plant fecundity and population dynamics

Holly R. Prendeville; Brigitte Tenhumberg; Diana Pilson

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
30
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Microorganisms are ubiquitous and thought to regulate host populations. Although microorganisms can be pathogenic and affect components of fitness, few studies have examined their effects on wild plant populations. As individual traits might not contribute equally to changes in population growth rate, it is essential to examine the entire life cycle to determine how microorganisms affect host population dynamics. In this study, we used data from common garden experiments with plants from three Cucurbita pepo populations exposed to three virus treatments. These data were used to parameterize a deterministic matrix model, which allowed us to estimate the effect of virus on components of fitness and population growth rate. Virus did not reduce fruit number, but population growth rates varied among virus treatments and wild C. pepo populations. The effect of virus on population growth rate depended on virus species and wild C. pepo population. Contributions of life-history transitions and life-history traits to population growth rates varied among populations and virus treatments. However, this population-virus interaction was not evident when examining individual components of fitness. Thus, caution must be used when interpreting the effects of changes in individual traits, as single traits do not always predict population-level change accurately.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Virus did not reduce fruit number.

Taxon
Cucurbita pepoCucurbita pepot0
Treatment
Viruse0
Outcome
fruit numbere0
Direction
did not reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita pepo
Cucurbita pepo · TaxonFrank Vincentz · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Virus did not reduce fruit number”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–763 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucurbita pepo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–513 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Population growth rates varied among virus treatments and wild populations.

Taxon
C. pepoCucurbita pepoe0
Treatment
virus treatmentse0
Outcome
population growth ratese0
Direction
variede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita pepo
Cucurbita pepo · TaxonFrank Vincentz · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“population growth rates varied among virus treatments and wild C. pepo populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–851 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The effect of virus on population growth rate depended on virus species and population.

Taxon
C. pepoCucurbita pepoe0
Treatment
viruse0
Outcome
population growth ratee0
Qualifier
virus species and wild C. pepo populatione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita pepo
Cucurbita pepo · TaxonFrank Vincentz · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of virus on population growth rate depended on virus species and wild C. pepo population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–952 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Contributions of life-history transitions and traits to population growth rates varied among populations and virus treatments.

Taxon
Cucurbita pepoCucurbita pepot0
Treatment
virus treatmentse0
Outcome
Contributions of life-history transitions and life-history traits to population growth ratese0
Direction
variede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita pepo
Cucurbita pepo · TaxonFrank Vincentz · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Contributions of life-history transitions and life-history traits to population growth rates varied among populations and virus treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1092 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucurbita pepo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–513 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The population-virus interaction was not evident for individual fitness components.

Taxon
Cucurbita pepoCucurbita pepot0
Outcome
population-virus interaction was not evident when examining individual components of fitnesse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucurbita pepo
Cucurbita pepo · TaxonFrank Vincentz · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this population-virus interaction was not evident when examining individual components of fitness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1200 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucurbita pepo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–513 · show in text ↑