Paper · 2003 · Weed Technology

Influence of Diphenylether Herbicide Application Rate and Timing on Common Waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) Control in Soybean (Glycine max)1

AARON G. HAGER; LOYD M. WAX; GERMAN A. BOLLERO; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
108
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Diphenylether herbicides may be viable options for postemergence (POST) control of common waterhemp in soybean. A 2-yr field research project was conducted to determine whether common waterhemp control is influenced by application timing and rate of acifluorfen, fomesafen, and lactofen. Common waterhemp control was 9, 9, and 8% greater 7, 14, and 21 d after treatment, respectively, after the early postemergence (EPOST) application timing compared with the POST application timing. Lactofen provided greater common waterhemp control than did acifluorfen or fomesafen, and only the highest application of lactofen provided greater than 85% common waterhemp control 21 d after POST application. No significant differences in common waterhemp dry weight were determined among the three rates of acifluorfen, fomesafen, and lactofen applied EPOST. The highest application rates of fomesafen and lactofen reduced common waterhemp dry weight more than did the lowest application rates applied POST. The highest application rate of fomesafen also reduced common waterhemp dry weight more than did the intermediate application rate. Single degree of freedom contrasts indicated that all diphenylether herbicides reduced common waterhemp dry weight more than did imazethapyr.Nomenclature: Acifluorfen; fomesafen; imazethapyr; lactofen; common waterhemp, Amaranthus rudis Sauer #3 AMATA; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.Additional index words: Postemergence, herbicide application rate, herbicide application timing, weed control.Abbreviations: ALS, acetolactate synthase; COC, crop oil concentrate; DAT, days after treatment; EPOST, early postemergence; NIS, nonionic surfactant; POST, postemergence.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early postemergence application timing gave 9, 9 and 8% greater common waterhemp control at 7, 14 and 21 days after treatment than the POST timing.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
early postemergence (EPOST) application timinge1
Interactor
common waterhempe0weed
Outcome
Common waterhemp controle1
Direction
greatere1
Value
9, 9, and 8%e1
Comparator
POST application timinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Diphenylether herbicides may be viable options for postemergence (POST) control of common waterhemp in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“Common waterhemp control was 9, 9, and 8% greater 7, 14, and 21 d after treatment, respectively, after the early postemergence (EPOST) application timing compared with the POST application timing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–483 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lactofen gave greater common waterhemp control than acifluorfen or fomesafen.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Lactofene2
Interactor
common waterhempe0weed
Outcome
common waterhemp controle2
Direction
greatere2
Comparator
acifluorfen or fomesafene2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Diphenylether herbicides may be viable options for postemergence (POST) control of common waterhemp in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–110 · show in text ↑
e2

“Lactofen provided greater common waterhemp control than did acifluorfen or fomesafen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–569 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only the highest application of lactofen gave greater than 85% common waterhemp control 21 days after POST application.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
highest application of lactofene3
Interactor
common waterhempe0weed
Outcome
common waterhemp control 21 d after POST applicatione3
Value
greater than 85%e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Diphenylether herbicides may be viable options for postemergence (POST) control of common waterhemp in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–110 · show in text ↑
e3

“only the highest application of lactofen provided greater than 85% common waterhemp control 21 d after POST application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–694 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No significant difference in common waterhemp dry weight was found among the three rates of acifluorfen, fomesafen and lactofen applied EPOST.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
three rates of acifluorfen, fomesafen, and lactofen applied EPOSTe4
Interactor
common waterhempe0weed
Outcome
common waterhemp dry weighte4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Diphenylether herbicides may be viable options for postemergence (POST) control of common waterhemp in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–110 · show in text ↑
e4

“No significant differences in common waterhemp dry weight were determined among the three rates of acifluorfen, fomesafen, and lactofen applied EPOST”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–845 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest application rates of fomesafen and lactofen reduced common waterhemp dry weight more than the lowest rates applied POST.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
highest application rates of fomesafen and lactofene5
Interactor
common waterhempe0weed
Outcome
common waterhemp dry weighte5
Direction
reducede5
Comparator
lowest application rates applied POSTe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Diphenylether herbicides may be viable options for postemergence (POST) control of common waterhemp in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–110 · show in text ↑
e5

“The highest application rates of fomesafen and lactofen reduced common waterhemp dry weight more than did the lowest application rates applied POST”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–994 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest application rate of fomesafen reduced common waterhemp dry weight more than the intermediate rate.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
highest application rate of fomesafene6
Interactor
common waterhempe0weed
Outcome
common waterhemp dry weighte6
Direction
reducede6
Comparator
intermediate application ratee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Diphenylether herbicides may be viable options for postemergence (POST) control of common waterhemp in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–110 · show in text ↑
e6

“The highest application rate of fomesafen also reduced common waterhemp dry weight more than did the intermediate application rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All diphenylether herbicides reduced common waterhemp dry weight more than imazethapyr did.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
diphenylether herbicidese7
Interactor
common waterhempe0weed
Outcome
common waterhemp dry weighte7
Direction
reducede7
Comparator
imazethapyre7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Diphenylether herbicides may be viable options for postemergence (POST) control of common waterhemp in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–110 · show in text ↑
e7

“all diphenylether herbicides reduced common waterhemp dry weight more than did imazethapyr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1268 · show in text ↑

fomesafen · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

herbicide · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

122 papers: 60 positive, 62 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 58 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

118 papers more in this group

See all 122 papers →

herbicide · control · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

123 papers: 99 positive, 24 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

119 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.