Paper · 2009 · The ISME Journal

Community shifts of soybean stem-associated bacteria responding to different nodulation phenotypes and N levels

Seishi Ikeda; Takashi Okubo; Takakazu Kaneko; et al.

10
claims
22
verbatim quotes
73
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The diversity of stem-associated bacteria of non-nodulated (Nod(-)), wild-type nodulated (Nod(+)) and hypernodulated (Nod(++)) soybeans were evaluated by clone library analyses of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene. Soybeans were dressed with standard nitrogen (SN) fertilization (15 kg N ha(-1)) and heavy nitrogen (HN) fertilization (615 kg N ha(-1)). The relative abundance of Alphaproteobacteria in Nod(+) soybeans (66%) was smaller than that in Nod(-) and Nod(++) soybeans (75-76%) under SN fertilization, whereas that of Gammaproteobacteria showed the opposite pattern (23% in Nod(+) and 12-16% in Nod(-) and Nod(++) soybeans). Principal coordinate analysis showed that the bacterial communities of Nod(-) and Nod(++) soybeans were more similar to each other than to that of Nod(+) soybeans under SN fertilization. HN fertilization increased the relative abundance of Gammaproteobacteria in all nodulation phenotypes (33-57%) and caused drastic shifts of the bacterial community. The clustering analyses identified a subset of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at the species level in Alpha- and Gammaproteobacteria responding to both the nodulation phenotypes and nitrogen fertilization levels. Meanwhile, the abundance of Betaproteobacteria was relatively constant in all libraries constructed under these environmental conditions. The relative abundances of two OTUs in Alphaproteobacteria (Aurantimonas sp. and Methylobacterium sp.) were especially sensitive to nodulation phenotype and were drastically decreased under HN fertilization. These results suggested that a subpopulation of proteobacteria in soybeans is controlled in a similar manner through both the regulation systems of plant-rhizobia symbiosis and the nitrogen signaling pathway in plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alphaproteobacteria were less abundant in nodulated (Nod(+)) soybeans than in Nod(-) and Nod(++) soybeans under standard nitrogen fertilization.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
Nod(+) soybeanse1
Treatment
SN fertilizatione1
Outcome
relative abundance of Alphaproteobacteriae1
Direction
smallere1
Value
66%e1
Comparator
Nod(-) and Nod(++) soybeanse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soybean stem-associated bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–52 · show in text ↑
e1

“The relative abundance of Alphaproteobacteria in Nod(+) soybeans (66%) was smaller than that in Nod(-) and Nod(++) soybeans (75-76%) under SN fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–501 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gammaproteobacteria were more abundant in Nod(+) soybeans (23%) than in Nod(-) and Nod(++) soybeans (12-16%) under standard nitrogen fertilization.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
Nod(+)e2
Outcome
Gammaproteobacteriae2
Direction
higherinferrede2
Value
23%e2
Comparator
Nod(-) and Nod(++) soybeanse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soybean stem-associated bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–52 · show in text ↑
e2

“whereas that of Gammaproteobacteria showed the opposite pattern (23% in Nod(+) and 12-16% in Nod(-) and Nod(++) soybeans)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–624 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heavy nitrogen fertilization increased Gammaproteobacteria in all nodulation phenotypes.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
HN fertilizatione3
Outcome
relative abundance of Gammaproteobacteriae3
Direction
increasede3
Value
33-57%e3
Comparator
standard nitrogen (SN) fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soybean stem-associated bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–52 · show in text ↑
e0

“Soybeans were dressed with standard nitrogen (SN) fertilization (15 kg N ha(-1)) and heavy nitrogen (HN) fertilization (615 kg N ha(-1))”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–344 · show in text ↑
e3

“HN fertilization increased the relative abundance of Gammaproteobacteria in all nodulation phenotypes (33-57%) and caused drastic shifts of the bacterial community”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–976 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heavy nitrogen fertilization caused drastic shifts of the soybean stem bacterial community.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
HN fertilizatione3
Outcome
bacterial communitye3
Direction
drastic shiftse3
Comparator
standard nitrogen (SN) fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soybean stem-associated bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–52 · show in text ↑
e0

“Soybeans were dressed with standard nitrogen (SN) fertilization (15 kg N ha(-1)) and heavy nitrogen (HN) fertilization (615 kg N ha(-1))”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–344 · show in text ↑
e3

“HN fertilization increased the relative abundance of Gammaproteobacteria in all nodulation phenotypes (33-57%) and caused drastic shifts of the bacterial community”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–976 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial communities of Nod(-) and Nod(++) soybeans were more similar to each other than to Nod(+) soybeans under standard nitrogen fertilization.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
Nod(-) and Nod(++) soybeanse4
Treatment
SN fertilizatione4
Outcome
bacterial communitiese4
Direction
more similare4
Comparator
Nod(+) soybeanse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soybean stem-associated bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–52 · show in text ↑
e4

“Principal coordinate analysis showed that the bacterial communities of Nod(-) and Nod(++) soybeans were more similar to each other than to that of Nod(+) soybeans under SN fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–811 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clustering identified a subset of OTUs at the species level in Alpha- and Gammaproteobacteria responding to both nodulation phenotype and nitrogen level.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
a subset of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at the species levele5
Qualifier
responding to both the nodulation phenotypes and nitrogen fertilization levelse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soybean stem-associated bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–52 · show in text ↑
e5

“The clustering analyses identified a subset of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at the species level in Alpha- and Gammaproteobacteria responding to both the nodulation phenotypes and nitrogen fertilization levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1193 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Betaproteobacteria abundance was relatively constant across all libraries.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
abundance of Betaproteobacteriae6
Direction
relatively constante6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soybean stem-associated bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–52 · show in text ↑
e6

“the abundance of Betaproteobacteria was relatively constant in all libraries constructed under these environmental conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1331 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two Alphaproteobacteria OTUs (Aurantimonas sp. and Methylobacterium sp.) were drastically decreased under heavy nitrogen fertilization.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
HN fertilizatione7
Interactor
Aurantimonas sp.Aurantimonase7other
Second interactor
Methylobacterium sp.Methylobacteriume7other
Outcome
relative abundances of two OTUs in Alphaproteobacteriae7
Direction
drastically decreasede7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soybean stem-associated bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–52 · show in text ↑
e7

“The relative abundances of two OTUs in Alphaproteobacteria (Aurantimonas sp. and Methylobacterium sp.) were especially sensitive to nodulation phenotype and were drastically decreased under HN fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1539 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two Alphaproteobacteria OTUs were especially sensitive to nodulation phenotype.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Interactor
Aurantimonas sp.Aurantimonase7other
Second interactor
Methylobacterium sp.Methylobacteriume7other
Outcome
relative abundances of two OTUs in Alphaproteobacteriae7
Qualifier
especially sensitive to nodulation phenotypee7

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soybean stem-associated bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–52 · show in text ↑
e7

“The relative abundances of two OTUs in Alphaproteobacteria (Aurantimonas sp. and Methylobacterium sp.) were especially sensitive to nodulation phenotype and were drastically decreased under HN fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1539 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A subpopulation of soybean proteobacteria is likely controlled both by plant-rhizobia symbiosis regulation and by the nitrogen signalling pathway.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
a subpopulation of proteobacteriae1
Qualifier
regulation systems of plant-rhizobia symbiosis and the nitrogen signaling pathwaye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soybean stem-associated bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–52 · show in text ↑
e1

“These results suggested that a subpopulation of proteobacteria in soybeans is controlled in a similar manner through both the regulation systems of plant-rhizobia symbiosis and the nitrogen signaling pathway in plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1541–1758 · show in text ↑