Paper · 1968 · Experimental Agriculture

Inoculation of Peanuts by Application of Rhizobium Suspension into the Planting Furrows

J. Schiffmann; Y. Alper

2
claims
5
verbatim quotes
35
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Summary Soil inoculation was tried in field experiments during two seasons using different concentrations and amounts of bacterial suspension and compared with direct seed inoculation of chemically protected and unprotected peanut seed. Soil inoculation gave significantly better results than direct inoculation of chemically protected or unprotected seed. Large yields of high quality peanuts, which compared favourably with highly nitrogen-fertilized peanuts, were obtained after the application of relatively small amounts (10–40 gm.) of enriched peat inoculant in 5 litres of water per dunam (1/10 ha).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil inoculation with Rhizobium gave significantly better peanut results than direct seed inoculation.

Treatment
Soil inoculatione1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiumt0symbiont
Outcome
resultse1
Direction
significantly bettere1
Comparator
direct inoculation of chemically protected or unprotected seede1
Setting
field experimentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil inoculation was tried in field experiments during two seasons using different concentrations and amounts of bacterial suspension and compared with direct seed inoculation of chemically protected and unprotected peanut seed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–236 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soil inoculation gave significantly better results than direct inoculation of chemically protected or unprotected seed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–356 · show in text ↑
t0

“Inoculation of Peanuts by Application of Rhizobium Suspension”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of enriched peat inoculant to soil gave large yields of high quality peanuts, comparable to highly nitrogen-fertilized peanuts.

Taxon
peanutsArachis hypogaeae2
Treatment
application of relatively small amounts (10–40 gm.) of enriched peat inoculant in 5 litres of water per duname2
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiumt0symbiont
Outcome
yields of high quality peanutse2
Direction
compared favourablye2
Comparator
highly nitrogen-fertilized peanutse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Large yields of high quality peanuts, which compared favourably with highly nitrogen-fertilized peanuts, were obtained after the application of relatively small amounts (10–40 gm.) of enriched peat inoculant in 5 litres of water per dunam (1/10 ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–606 · show in text ↑
t0

“Inoculation of Peanuts by Application of Rhizobium Suspension”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Rhizobium · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

27 papers: 21 positive, 6 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

growing medium · Rhizobium · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.