Paper · 1993 · IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems

Azimuthal scattering pattern of trees at X-band

R.M. Narayanan; S.E. Nelson; J.P. Dalton

4
claims
6
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The azimuthal scattering characteristics of a variety of fully foliated trees were measured in the field using a short-range X-band bistatic radar system operating at 9 GHz. Azimuthal measurements were made for both VV and VH polarizations over a 180 degrees angle between the transmitter and receiver antennas at 10 degrees intervals. Data were collected at transmit and receive ranges of approximately 5 m, and the beam impinged horizontally on the trees. The azimuthal power pattern, normalized to the copolarized backscattered power, showed a peak in the forward scattering direction (azimuth angle of 180 degrees ) due to direct coherent transmission, whose magnitude was seen to depend on the foliage area density. The diffuse bistatically scattered power in the range of azimuth angles between 10 degrees and 90 degrees showed standard deviations on the order of 4 dB. In addition, needleleaf trees were found to depolarize the incident energy more than the broadleaf trees.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">></ETX>

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The normalized azimuthal power pattern had a forward-scattering peak due to direct coherent transmission.

Outcome
peak in the forward scattering directione0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The azimuthal power pattern, normalized to the copolarized backscattered power, showed a peak in the forward scattering direction (azimuth angle of 180 degrees ) due to direct coherent transmission”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–655 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The forward-scattering peak magnitude depended on foliage area density.

Taxon
treest0
Organ / stage
foliagee0
Outcome
magnitudee0
Qualifier
foliage area densitye0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“whose magnitude was seen to depend on the foliage area density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–719 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diffuse bistatically scattered power at 10 to 90 degrees had standard deviations around 4 dB.

Taxon
treest0
Outcome
standard deviationse0
Value
4 dBe0
Qualifier
between 10 degrees and 90 degreese0

Verbatim

t0

“trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“The diffuse bistatically scattered power in the range of azimuth angles between 10 degrees and 90 degrees showed standard deviations on the order of 4 dB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–874 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Needleleaf trees depolarized incident energy more than broadleaf trees.

Taxon
needleleaf treese0
Outcome
depolarize the incident energye0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
broadleaf treese0

Verbatim

e0

“needleleaf trees were found to depolarize the incident energy more than the broadleaf trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–980 · show in text ↑