Paper · 2011 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

WHEAT RESPONSE TO FARM YARD MANURE AND NITROGEN FERTILIZATION UNDER MOISTURE STRESS CONDITIONS

Amanullah Jan; Amanullah; Maimoona Noor

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
23
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Information on the combined use of organic and inorganic fertilizers on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) productivity is lacking under moisture stress conditions of Northwest Pakistan. The present experiment was designed to ascertain the combined effect of organic and inorganic fertilizer management on rainfed wheat. Four levels of farm yard manure, FYM, (0, 10, 20, and 30 Mg FYM ha−1) and nitrogen (0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 kg N ha−1) were used. The experiment was conducted at the Agriculture Research Farm of NWFP Agricultural University Peshawar, Pakistan during crop season of 2003–04. The experiment was laid out in randomized complete block design with four replications. Plant height, productive tillers m−2, grains spike−1, grain yield, straw yield, and harvest index were significantly higher in plots which received 30 Mg FYM ha−1. In the case of nitrogen (N) no distinctive differences between the effect of 90 and 120 kg ha−1 was observed for most of the parameters. Nitrogen application at 90 kg ha−1 had significantly higher; plant height, grains spike−1, grain yield, straw yield, and harvest index as compared with the lower levels, i.e., 0, 30, and 60 kg N ha−1 but were at par with 120 N kg ha−1. Significantly higher numbers of productive tillers m−2, grains spike−1, grain yield, straw yield and harvest index were recorded with application of 30 Mg FYM ha−1 + 90 kg N ha−1. The present study suggested that application of 30 Mg FYM ha−1 + 90 kg N ha−1 are promising levels for higher production of wheat under moisture stress conditions. Further research work is needed to ascertain the effect of N above 90 kg ha−1 under different moisture regimes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height, productive tillers per m2 and grains per spike were significantly higher in wheat plots receiving 30 Mg FYM per ha.

Treatment
30 Mg FYM ha−1e0
Outcome
Plant height, productive tillers m−2, grains spike−1e0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
e0

“Plant height, productive tillers m−2, grains spike−1, grain yield, straw yield, and harvest index were significantly higher in plots which received 30 Mg FYM ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–838 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield, straw yield and harvest index were significantly higher in wheat plots receiving 30 Mg FYM per ha.

Treatment
30 Mg FYM ha−1e0
Outcome
grain yield, straw yield, and harvest indexe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
e0

“Plant height, productive tillers m−2, grains spike−1, grain yield, straw yield, and harvest index were significantly higher in plots which received 30 Mg FYM ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–838 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For most parameters no distinctive differences were observed between 90 and 120 kg N per ha in wheat.

Treatment
nitrogen (N)e0
Outcome
most of the parameterse0
Direction
no distinctive differencese0
Qualifier
90 and 120 kg ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the case of nitrogen (N) no distinctive differences between the effect of 90 and 120 kg ha−1 was observed for most of the parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–975 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen at 90 kg per ha gave significantly higher plant height and grains per spike than the lower levels of 0, 30 and 60 kg N per ha.

Treatment
Nitrogen application at 90 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
plant height, grains spike−1e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
0, 30, and 60 kg N ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
e0

“Nitrogen application at 90 kg ha−1 had significantly higher; plant height, grains spike−1, grain yield, straw yield, and harvest index as compared with the lower levels, i.e., 0, 30, and 60 kg N ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen at 90 kg per ha gave significantly higher grain yield, straw yield and harvest index than the lower levels of 0, 30 and 60 kg N per ha.

Treatment
Nitrogen application at 90 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
grain yield, straw yield, and harvest indexe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
0, 30, and 60 kg N ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
e0

“Nitrogen application at 90 kg ha−1 had significantly higher; plant height, grains spike−1, grain yield, straw yield, and harvest index as compared with the lower levels, i.e., 0, 30, and 60 kg N ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Productive tillers per m2 and grains per spike were significantly higher with 30 Mg FYM plus 90 kg N per ha.

Treatment
30 Mg FYM ha−1 + 90 kg N ha−1e0
Outcome
productive tillers m−2, grains spike−1e0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
e0

“Significantly higher numbers of productive tillers m−2, grains spike−1, grain yield, straw yield and harvest index were recorded with application of 30 Mg FYM ha−1 + 90 kg N ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1391 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield, straw yield and harvest index were significantly higher with 30 Mg FYM plus 90 kg N per ha.

Treatment
30 Mg FYM ha−1 + 90 kg N ha−1e0
Outcome
grain yield, straw yield and harvest indexe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
e0

“Significantly higher numbers of productive tillers m−2, grains spike−1, grain yield, straw yield and harvest index were recorded with application of 30 Mg FYM ha−1 + 90 kg N ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1391 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest 30 Mg FYM plus 90 kg N per ha as promising levels for higher wheat production under moisture stress.

Treatment
30 Mg FYM ha−1 + 90 kg N ha−1e0
Outcome
promising levels for higher productione0
Setting
moisture stress conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The present study suggested that application of 30 Mg FYM ha−1 + 90 kg N ha−1 are promising levels for higher production of wheat under moisture stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1555 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.