Paper · 1979 · Experimental Agriculture

Planting Date, Insect Damage and Yield of Cowpea in Western Nigeria

D. Nangju; K. F. Nwanze; S. R. Singh

3
claims
3
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY With the exception of leafy and daylength-sensitive cultivars, cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp), produced larger yields in the first season (April-July) than in the second season (September-November) at Ibadan, Western Nigeria, whether or not the crop was protected by insecticide. The populations of major cowpea pests were low at the start of the rainy season and reached their peaks in September or October. The implications of these results in insect control strategy are discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea yields were larger in the first season (April-July) than in the second season (September-November) at Ibadan, whether or not insecticide protected the crop.

Treatment
first season (April-July)e0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
largere0
Qualifier
whether or not the crop was protected by insecticidee0
Comparator
second season (September-November)e0
Setting
Ibadan, Western Nigeriae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the exception of leafy and daylength-sensitive cultivars, cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp), produced larger yields in the first season (April-July) than in the second season (September-November) at Ibadan, Western Nigeria, whether or not the crop was protected by insecticide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–293 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Populations of major cowpea pests were low at the start of the rainy season.

Interactor
major cowpea pestse1pest
Outcome
populationse1
Direction
lowe1
Qualifier
at the start of the rainy seasone1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The populations of major cowpea pests were low at the start of the rainy season and reached their peaks in September or October”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–422 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Populations of major cowpea pests peaked in September or October.

Interactor
major cowpea pestse1pest
Outcome
populationse1
Direction
peakse1
Qualifier
in September or Octobere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The populations of major cowpea pests were low at the start of the rainy season and reached their peaks in September or October”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–422 · show in text ↑

climate site · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.