Paper · 2003 · Genetics Research

Genetic structure and differentiation in cultivated grape, Vitis vinifera L.

MALLIKARJUNA K. ARADHYA; GERALD S. DANGL; BERNARD H. PRINS; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
285
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

222 cultivated (Vitis vinifera) and 22 wild (V. vinifera ssp. sylvestris) grape accessions were analysed for genetic diversity and differentiation at eight microsatellite loci. A total of 94 alleles were detected, with extensive polymorphism among the accessions. Multivariate relationships among accessions revealed 16 genetic groups structured into three clusters, supporting the classical eco-geographic grouping of grape cultivars: occidentalis, pontica and orientalis. French cultivars appeared to be distinct and showed close affinity to the wild progenitor, ssp. sylvestris from south-western France (Pyrenees) and Tunisia, probably reflecting the origin and domestication history of many of the old wine cultivars from France. There was appreciable level of differentiation between table and wine grape cultivars, and the Muscat types were somewhat distinct within the wine grapes. Contingency chi2 analysis indicated significant heterogeneity in allele frequencies among groups at all loci. The observed heterozygosities for different groups ranged from 0.625 to 0.9 with an overall average of 0.771. Genetic relationships among groups suggested hierarchical differentiation within cultivated grape. The gene diversity analysis indicated narrow divergence among groups and that most variation was found within groups (approximately 85%). Partitioning of diversity suggested that the remaining variation is somewhat structured hierarchically at different levels of differentiation. The overall organization of genetic diversity suggests that the germplasm of cultivated grape represents a single complex gene pool and that its structure is determined by strong artificial selection and a vegetative mode of reproduction.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The grape accessions carried 94 microsatellite alleles with extensive polymorphism.

Taxon
grapet0
Outcome
allelese0
Value
94 allelese0

Verbatim

e0

“A total of 94 alleles were detected, with extensive polymorphism among the accessions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–263 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grape accessions formed 16 genetic groups in three clusters.

Taxon
grapet0
Outcome
genetic groupse0
Value
16 genetic groupse0

Verbatim

e0

“Multivariate relationships among accessions revealed 16 genetic groups structured into three clusters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–365 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The groups supported occidentalis, pontica and orientalis eco-geographic grouping.

Taxon
grapee0
Outcome
eco-geographic grouping of grape cultivarse0

Verbatim

e0

“supporting the classical eco-geographic grouping of grape cultivars: occidentalis, pontica and orientalis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–473 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

French cultivars were distinct and close to wild sylvestris.

Taxon
grapet0
Material
French cultivarse0
Outcome
close affinity to the wild progenitore0
Setting
south-western France (Pyrenees) and Tunisiae0

Verbatim

e0

“French cultivars appeared to be distinct and showed close affinity to the wild progenitor, ssp. sylvestris from south-western France (Pyrenees) and Tunisia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–629 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Table and wine cultivars were appreciably differentiated.

Taxon
grapee0
Material
table and wine grape cultivarse0
Outcome
differentiatione0

Verbatim

e0

“There was appreciable level of differentiation between table and wine grape cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–820 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Muscat types were distinct within wine grapes.

Taxon
grapee0
Material
Muscat typese0
Outcome
distinct within the wine grapese0

Verbatim

e0

“the Muscat types were somewhat distinct within the wine grapes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–889 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Allele frequencies differed significantly among groups at all loci.

Taxon
grapet0
Outcome
heterogeneity in allele frequenciese0

Verbatim

e0

“significant heterogeneity in allele frequencies among groups at all loci.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–999 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Group heterozygosity ranged from 0.625 to 0.9.

Taxon
grapet0
Outcome
observed heterozygositiese0
Value
0.625 to 0.9e0

Verbatim

e0

“The observed heterozygosities for different groups ranged from 0.625 to 0.9 with an overall average of 0.771.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1109 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Overall average heterozygosity was 0.771.

Taxon
grapet0
Outcome
overall averagee0
Value
0.771e0

Verbatim

e0

“The observed heterozygosities for different groups ranged from 0.625 to 0.9 with an overall average of 0.771.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1109 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genetic relationships suggested hierarchical differentiation in cultivated grape.

Taxon
grapee0
Outcome
hierarchical differentiatione0

Verbatim

e0

“Genetic relationships among groups suggested hierarchical differentiation within cultivated grape.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1208 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most grape variation was within groups, approximately 85%.

Taxon
grapet0
Outcome
variation was found within groupse0
Value
approximately 85%e0

Verbatim

e0

“most variation was found within groups (approximately 85%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1346 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genetic diversity analysis found narrow divergence among groups.

Taxon
grapet0
Outcome
narrow divergence among groupse0

Verbatim

e0

“The gene diversity analysis indicated narrow divergence among groups”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1277 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–57 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer a single complex gene pool shaped by selection and vegetative reproduction.

Taxon
grapee0
Outcome
single complex gene poole0
Qualifier
strong artificial selection and a vegetative mode of reproductione0

Verbatim

e0

“the germplasm of cultivated grape represents a single complex gene pool and that its structure is determined by strong artificial selection and a vegetative mode of reproduction.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1550–1728 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–57 · show in text ↑