Paper · 2007 · Starch - Stärke

Classification of Rice Amylose Content by Discriminant Analysis of Physicochemical Properties

Prisana Suwannaporn; Sawidtree Pitiphunpong; Sirirat Champangern

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
103
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Amylose content is commonly used to predict the texture of cooked rice. However, rice classification using only amylose content can misclassify actual sensory quality. Quality assessment of cooked rice can be determined by a combined evaluation of physical, chemical and sensory properties, but this process is costly and requires use of trained panelists. In this study, an alternate method for predicting rice amylose content was investigated. Paste viscosity and cooked rice texture of nine rice varieties were measured that had either low, medium, or high amylose content. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance, Pearson correlation, and discriminant analysis. Results showed that protein content, which played a major role in cooked rice texture, did not correlate with amylose content. Discriminant analysis results showed that only pasting attributes could discriminate the amylose groups but not texture. Pasting property, peak viscosity, and trough were the best discriminators with an eigenvalue of 32.9. These discriminators correctly predicted 100% of medium‐ and high‐amylose rice, but only correctly predicted 66.7% of low‐amylose rice with 88.9% of cross‐validated grouped cases correctly classified. The use of rice texture and pasting properties in combination with multivariate analysis techniques has potential as an easier and less costly method for the accurate classification of rice based on sensory quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice protein content did not correlate with amylose content.

Outcome
amylose contente0
Qualifier
protein contente0

Not reportedCompoundDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“protein content, which played a major role in cooked rice texture, did not correlate with amylose content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–806 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–22 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein content played a major role in cooked rice texture.

Organ / stage
cooked ricee0
Outcome
cooked rice texturee0
Qualifier
protein contente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“protein content, which played a major role in cooked rice texture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–766 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–22 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pasting attributes discriminated amylose groups.

Outcome
discriminate the amylose groupse0
Comparator
texturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only pasting attributes could discriminate the amylose groups but not texture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–927 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–22 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Texture did not discriminate amylose groups.

Outcome
discriminate the amylose groupse0
Comparator
texturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only pasting attributes could discriminate the amylose groups but not texture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–927 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–22 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peak viscosity and trough were best discriminators with eigenvalue 32.9.

Outcome
best discriminatorse0
Value
32.9e0
Qualifier
peak viscosity, and troughe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“peak viscosity, and trough were the best discriminators with an eigenvalue of 32.9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1029 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–22 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The discriminators correctly predicted all medium amylose rice.

Taxon
medium‐ and high‐amylose ricee0
Outcome
correctly predictede0
Value
100%e0

Verbatim

e0

“correctly predicted 100% of medium‐ and high‐amylose rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1109 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The discriminators correctly predicted 66.7% of low amylose rice.

Taxon
low‐amylose ricee0
Outcome
correctly predictede0
Value
66.7%e0

Verbatim

e0

“only correctly predicted 66.7% of low‐amylose rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1165 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cross validation correctly classified 88.9% of grouped cases.

Outcome
cross‐validated grouped cases correctly classifiede0
Value
88.9%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“88.9% of cross‐validated grouped cases correctly classified”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1230 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–22 · show in text ↑