Paper · 2012 · Remote Sensing

Estimation of Evapotranspiration from Fields with and without Cover Crops Using Remote Sensing and in situ Methods

Brett Hankerson; Jeppe Kjaersgaard; Christopher Hay

2
claims
2
verbatim quotes
30
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Estimation of actual evapotranspiration (ETa) based on remotely sensed imagery is very valuable in agricultural regions where ETa rates can vary greatly from field to field. This research utilizes the image processing model METRIC (Mapping Evapotranspiration at high Resolution with Internalized Calibration) to estimate late season, post-harvest ETa rates from fields with a cover crop planted after a cash crop (in this case, a rye/radish/pea mixture planted after spring wheat). Remotely sensed EToF (unit-less fraction of grass-based reference ET, ETo) maps were generated using Erdas Imagine software for a 260 km2 area in northeastern South Dakota, USA. Meteorological information was obtained from a Bowen-Ratio Energy Balance System (BREBS) located within the image. Nine image dates were used for the growing season, from May through October. Five of those nine were captured during the cover crop season. METRIC was found to successfully differentiate between fields with and without cover crops. In a blind comparison, METRIC compared favorably with the estimated ETa rates found using the BREBS (ETλE), with a difference in total estimated ETa for the cover crop season of 7%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

METRIC differentiated fields with and without cover crops.

Taxon
cover cropse0
Outcome
differentiate between fields with and without cover cropse0
Comparator
without cover cropse0

Verbatim

e0

“METRIC was found to successfully differentiate between fields with and without cover crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1006 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

METRIC cover-season evapotranspiration estimates differed from BREBS estimates by 7%.

Taxon
cover crope0
Outcome
total estimated ETae0
Value
7%e0
Comparator
BREBS (ETλE)e0

Verbatim

e0

“In a blind comparison, METRIC compared favorably with the estimated ETa rates found using the BREBS (ETλE), with a difference in total estimated ETa for the cover crop season of 7%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1188 · show in text ↑