Abstract

Abstract Tomato plants in Nigeria were subjected to foliar sprays of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki (formulated as Dipel and Thuricide) and Baculovirus heliothis (Elcar), to which carbaryl, plus the adjuvants Tenac and Gustol were on occasion added, to test their effectiveness against Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) and other lepidopterous larvae. H. armigera larvae were found susceptible to both pathogens. The 0·5 kg/ha and the 1·0 kg/ha applications of Bacillus thuringiensis gave good field control of the larvae, similar to that of carbaryl at 1·5 kg/ha. Bacillus and virus were compatible but not significantly more effective when combined than when applied separately. Combinations of bacillus and virus with carbaryl were also not significantly more effective than the pathogens applied separately. B. thuringiensis at 0·5 kg/ha applied with carbaryl at 0·5 kg/ha was as good as carbaryl at 1·5 kg/ha. Gustol and Tenac did not significantly increase the effectiveness of the pathogens.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki at 0.5 and 1.0 kg/ha gave field control of Helicoverpa armigera larvae similar to carbaryl at 1.5 kg/ha.

Treatment
The 0·5 kg/ha and the 1·0 kg/ha applications of Bacillus thuringiensise1
Interactor
helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat0pest
Second interactor
Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstakiBacillus thuringiensis serovar kurstakit0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
field control of the larvaee1
Direction
similare1
Comparator
carbaryl at 1·5 kg/hae1
Setting
south-western Nigeriat0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficacy of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki and Baculovirus heliothis foliar applications for suppression of helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Noctuidae) and other lepidopterous larvae on tomato in south-western Nigeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–223 · show in text ↑
e1

“The 0·5 kg/ha and the 1·0 kg/ha applications of Bacillus thuringiensis gave good field control of the larvae, similar to that of carbaryl at 1·5 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–567 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus thuringiensis and baculovirus were compatible but not significantly more effective when combined than when applied separately against Helicoverpa armigera.

Treatment
Bacillus and viruse2
Interactor
helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat0pest
Second interactor
Baculovirus heliothist0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
effectivee2
Direction
not significantly more effectivee2
Comparator
when applied separatelye2
Setting
south-western Nigeriat0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficacy of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki and Baculovirus heliothis foliar applications for suppression of helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Noctuidae) and other lepidopterous larvae on tomato in south-western Nigeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–223 · show in text ↑
e2

“Bacillus and virus were compatible but not significantly more effective when combined than when applied separately”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–683 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combinations of Bacillus and virus with carbaryl were not significantly more effective against Helicoverpa armigera than the pathogens applied separately.

Treatment
Combinations of bacillus and virus with carbaryle3
Interactor
helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat0pest
Second interactor
Baculovirus heliothist0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
effectivee3
Direction
not significantly more effectivee3
Comparator
the pathogens applied separatelye3
Setting
south-western Nigeriat0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficacy of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki and Baculovirus heliothis foliar applications for suppression of helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Noctuidae) and other lepidopterous larvae on tomato in south-western Nigeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–223 · show in text ↑
e3

“Combinations of bacillus and virus with carbaryl were also not significantly more effective than the pathogens applied separately”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus thuringiensis at 0.5 kg/ha applied with carbaryl at 0.5 kg/ha was as good as carbaryl at 1.5 kg/ha for field control of Helicoverpa armigera larvae.

Treatment
B. thuringiensis at 0·5 kg/ha applied with carbaryl at 0·5 kg/hae4
Interactor
helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat0pest
Second interactor
Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstakiBacillus thuringiensis serovar kurstakit0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
field controle1
Direction
as good ase4
Comparator
carbaryl at 1·5 kg/hae4
Setting
south-western Nigeriat0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficacy of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki and Baculovirus heliothis foliar applications for suppression of helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Noctuidae) and other lepidopterous larvae on tomato in south-western Nigeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–223 · show in text ↑
e1

“The 0·5 kg/ha and the 1·0 kg/ha applications of Bacillus thuringiensis gave good field control of the larvae, similar to that of carbaryl at 1·5 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–567 · show in text ↑
e4

“B. thuringiensis at 0·5 kg/ha applied with carbaryl at 0·5 kg/ha was as good as carbaryl at 1·5 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–917 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gustol and Tenac did not significantly increase the effectiveness of the pathogens against Helicoverpa armigera.

Treatment
Gustol and Tenace5
Interactor
helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat0pest
Outcome
effectivenesse5
Direction
did not significantly increasee5
Comparator
the pathogense5
Setting
south-western Nigeriat0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficacy of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki and Baculovirus heliothis foliar applications for suppression of helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Noctuidae) and other lepidopterous larvae on tomato in south-western Nigeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–223 · show in text ↑
e5

“Gustol and Tenac did not significantly increase the effectiveness of the pathogens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1001 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Helicoverpa armigera larvae were susceptible to both Bacillus thuringiensis and baculovirus.

Interactor
helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerat0pest
Second interactor
Baculovirus heliothist0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
susceptiblee6
Setting
south-western Nigeriat0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficacy of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki and Baculovirus heliothis foliar applications for suppression of helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Noctuidae) and other lepidopterous larvae on tomato in south-western Nigeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–223 · show in text ↑
e6

“H. armigera larvae were found susceptible to both pathogens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–415 · show in text ↑

Bacillus thuringiensis · Helicoverpa armigera · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

carbaryl · Helicoverpa armigera · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.