Paper · 1981 · Experimental Agriculture

Effects of Harvesting Frequency on Leaf and Root Yields of Cassava

M. T. Dahniya; C. O. Oputa; S. K. Hahn

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
18
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY Total fresh leaf yield of cassava ( Manihot esculenta Crantz) variety Isunikankiyan was not significantly affected by harvesting frequency, unlike variety TMS 30211. Compared with plants whose leaves were not harvested, there was a decrease in total fresh tuberous root yields of 56–76%, 34–62% and 15–32% when leaves were harvested at 1-, 2- and 3-month intervals respectively. The two cassava varieties reacted differently to leaf harvests in terms of tuber yields. Harvesting the top leaves of cassava at 2- or 3-month intervals is recommended to ensure reasonable yields of both leaves and tuberous roots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Isunikankiyan fresh leaf yield was not significantly affected by harvesting frequency.

Material
Isunikankiyane0
Treatment
harvesting frequencye0
Outcome
Total fresh leaf yielde0
Direction
not significantly affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total fresh leaf yield of cassava ( Manihot esculenta Crantz) variety Isunikankiyan was not significantly affected by harvesting frequency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TMS 30211 leaf yield responded to harvesting frequency.

Material
TMS 30211e0
Treatment
harvesting frequencye0
Outcome
Total fresh leaf yielde1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was not significantly affected by harvesting frequency, unlike variety TMS 30211”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–172 · show in text ↑
e1

“Total fresh leaf yield of cassava ( Manihot esculenta Crantz) variety Isunikankiyan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Monthly leaf harvest reduced fresh root yield by 56–76%.

Treatment
1-e0
Outcome
total fresh tuberous root yieldse0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
56–76%e0
Comparator
plants whose leaves were not harvestede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decrease in total fresh tuberous root yields of 56–76%, 34–62% and 15–32% when leaves were harvested at 1-, 2- and 3-month intervals respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–385 · show in text ↑
e1

“cassava ( Manihot esculenta Crantz)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–69 · show in text ↑
e2

“Compared with plants whose leaves were not harvested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–226 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two monthly leaf harvest reduced fresh root yield by 34–62%.

Treatment
2-e0
Outcome
total fresh tuberous root yieldse0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
34–62%e0
Comparator
plants whose leaves were not harvestede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decrease in total fresh tuberous root yields of 56–76%, 34–62% and 15–32% when leaves were harvested at 1-, 2- and 3-month intervals respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–385 · show in text ↑
e1

“cassava ( Manihot esculenta Crantz)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–69 · show in text ↑
e2

“Compared with plants whose leaves were not harvested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–226 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three monthly leaf harvest reduced fresh root yield by 15–32%.

Treatment
3-month intervalse0
Outcome
total fresh tuberous root yieldse0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
15–32%e0
Comparator
plants whose leaves were not harvestede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decrease in total fresh tuberous root yields of 56–76%, 34–62% and 15–32% when leaves were harvested at 1-, 2- and 3-month intervals respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–385 · show in text ↑
e1

“cassava ( Manihot esculenta Crantz)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–69 · show in text ↑
e2

“Compared with plants whose leaves were not harvested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–226 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two cassava varieties differed in their root yield response to leaf harvesting.

Material
two cassava varietiese0
Outcome
tuber yieldse0
Direction
differentlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The two cassava varieties reacted differently to leaf harvests in terms of tuber yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–474 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend harvesting top leaves every two or three months.

Outcome
Harvesting the top leaves of cassava at 2- or 3-month intervalse0
Qualifier
reasonable yields of both leaves and tuberous rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Harvesting the top leaves of cassava at 2- or 3-month intervals is recommended to ensure reasonable yields of both leaves and tuberous roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–616 · show in text ↑

pruning · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results differ

26 papers: 13 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.