Paper · 2005 · Agronomy Journal

Economic Evaluation of Soybean Fungicide Seed Treatments

Paul Scott Poag; Michael Popp; John Rupe; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
37
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of fungicide seed treatments on seeding rate, location, simulated rainfall at emergence, time of planting, and seed quality were analyzed for soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] in this study. Variation in plant emergence allowed estimation of economically optimal seeding rates and partial returns (PR = Gross revenue − Seed cost) across seed treatment options. Study results proved a single seed treatment to be superior across most study conditions. In fact, a comparison of optimally treated to untreated seed revealed that a seemingly insignificant input in terms of cost (<$8.65 ha −1 ) enhanced profitability by an average of $43.71 ha −1 in this study. Using high rather than low quality treated seed increased producer returns by an average of $64.27 ha −1 . Seeding rate recommendations need to be viewed with the precaution that added seed may be low cost insurance against lesser‐than‐expected survival rates. For the cultivar Hutcheson (MG V), planting in May compared with April and June provided better yields using less seed on average. Finally, as the planting season progressed, replanting plant population density thresholds decreased.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A single fungicide seed treatment was superior to the other options across most study conditions.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe5
Treatment
a single seed treatmente0
Outcome
superiore0
Direction
superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Study results proved a single seed treatment to be superior across most study conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–461 · show in text ↑
e5

“soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimally treated seed enhanced profitability by an average of $43.71 per ha compared with untreated seed, at an input cost under $8.65 per ha.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe5
Treatment
optimally treatede0
Outcome
profitabilitye0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
$43.71 ha −1e0
Qualifier
<$8.65 ha −1e0
Comparator
untreated seede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a comparison of optimally treated to untreated seed revealed that a seemingly insignificant input in terms of cost (<$8.65 ha −1 ) enhanced profitability by an average of $43.71 ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–655 · show in text ↑
e5

“soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Using high rather than low quality treated seed increased producer returns by an average of $64.27 per ha.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe5
Treatment
high rather than low quality treated seede0
Outcome
producer returnse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
$64.27 ha −1e0
Comparator
low quality treated seede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using high rather than low quality treated seed increased producer returns by an average of $64.27 ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–775 · show in text ↑
e5

“soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–187 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Seeding rate recommendations should be viewed with the precaution that added seed may be low cost insurance against lower-than-expected survival.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe5
Outcome
Seeding ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seeding rate recommendations need to be viewed with the precaution that added seed may be low cost insurance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–886 · show in text ↑
e5

“soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For cultivar Hutcheson (MG V), planting in May rather than April or June gave better yields on average.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe5
Material
Hutcheson (MG V)e0
Treatment
planting in Maye0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
April and Junee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For the cultivar Hutcheson (MG V), planting in May compared with April and June provided better yields using less seed on average”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1061 · show in text ↑
e5

“soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For cultivar Hutcheson (MG V), planting in May rather than April or June used less seed on average.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe5
Material
Hutcheson (MG V)e0
Treatment
planting in Maye0
Outcome
seede0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
April and Junee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For the cultivar Hutcheson (MG V), planting in May compared with April and June provided better yields using less seed on average”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1061 · show in text ↑
e5

“soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–187 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

As the planting season progressed, replanting plant population density thresholds decreased.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe5
Treatment
planting season progressede0
Outcome
replanting plant population density thresholdse0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“as the planting season progressed, replanting plant population density thresholds decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1163 · show in text ↑
e5

“soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–187 · show in text ↑

sowing time · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

207 papers: 115 positive, 92 negative or no effect

114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 89 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

203 papers more in this group

See all 207 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.