Paper · 2009 · Scientia Agricola

CTAB methods for DNA extraction of sweetpotato for microsatellite analysis

Aline Borges; Mariana Silva Rosa; Gustavo Henrique Recchia; et al.

3
claims
9
verbatim quotes
88
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Microsatellite markers have proved to be useful in genetic diversity assessments of sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas) but practical DNA extraction methods to ensure good quality and quantity DNA for these studies are yet to be established. This study compares the efficiency of three modified methodologies for DNA extraction of six sweetpotato landraces using the CTAB extraction buffer in regard to quantity and purity of DNA quantification and microsatellite band patterns. All methodologies yielded satisfactory results, but the method based in leaf tissue macerated in liquid nitrogen was deemed more adequate because of its simplicity and lower cost. However, the method based in dry leaf tissue was considered more advantageous, first because elicits practicability in the plant acquisition and drying process, especially when the collection is performed in situ, and also because its simplicity makes possible the cold storage of the dry, ground samples for future DNA extractions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All three modified CTAB DNA extraction methods gave satisfactory DNA quantity, purity and microsatellite band patterns in sweetpotato landraces.

Taxon
sweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Outcome
satisfactory resultse0
Comparator
three modified methodologiese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“All methodologies yielded satisfactory results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–519 · show in text ↑
e1

“three modified methodologies for DNA extraction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–321 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The method using leaf tissue macerated in liquid nitrogen was judged the most adequate of the three because of its simplicity and lower cost.

Taxon
sweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Outcome
more adequatee0
Qualifier
simplicity and lower coste0
Comparator
three modified methodologiese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“the method based in leaf tissue macerated in liquid nitrogen was deemed more adequate because of its simplicity and lower cost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–651 · show in text ↑
e1

“three modified methodologies for DNA extraction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–321 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The method using dry leaf tissue was considered more advantageous for its practicability in plant acquisition and drying and because dry ground samples can be cold-stored.

Taxon
sweetpotatoIpomoea batatast0
Outcome
more advantageouse0
Comparator
three modified methodologiese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“the method based in dry leaf tissue was considered more advantageous”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–730 · show in text ↑
e1

“three modified methodologies for DNA extraction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–321 · show in text ↑