Abstract
Research presents the results of the study object Agrotechnics performed between 1996 and 2010 on the reddish preluvosoil crop rotation field of Moara Domnească, the Romanian Plain, belonging to the Faculty of Agriculture, USAMV – Bucharest. The experiment was bifactorial, organised according to the split method, in four replications, with factor A being the rotation and factor B – fertilization with mineral nitrogen. Factor A – rotation –contained six rotations with the following graduations: a1 – wheat monoculture, a2 – maize monoculture, a3 –two-year rotation: 1. wheat, 2. maize, a4 –three-year rotation: 1. soybean, 2. wheat, 3. maize, a5 –four-year rotation: 1. peas, 2. wheat, 3. sugar beat, 4. maize, a6 – 1. sunflower, 2. wheat, 3. maize, 4. wheat/alfalfa. Factor B – fertilizing with mineral nitrogen, had the following graduations: b1 – unfertilised, b2 – N50, b3 - N100, b4 – N150. The following factors influencing the yield were discussed: the associated influence of crop rotation and fertilization with mineral nitrogen; the influence of the organic material amount in the soil, weed biomass, the content and the quantity of raw protein in wheat and maize. Under the influence of crop rotation, weeding reduction was achieved both in wheat and maize. The association of rotation with fertilization determined an increase in organic biomass, with an amplified action of the factors in maize. In wheat, the highest production was achieved in the three-year and four-year crop rotations, while in maize the maximum yield was achieved in the three-year crop rotation, four-year crop rotation and four-year crop rotation with jumping plot rotation after wheat.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Crop rotation reduced weeding in wheat.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- crop rotatione0
- Outcome
- weedinge0
- Direction
- reductione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Under the influence of crop rotation, weeding reduction was achieved both in wheat and maize.”
Claim · model-written summary
Crop rotation reduced weeding in maize.
Zea maysNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Under the influence of crop rotation, weeding reduction was achieved both in wheat and maize.”
Claim · model-written summary
Rotation combined with fertilization increased organic biomass, especially in maize.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The association of rotation with fertilization determined an increase in organic biomass, with an amplified action of the factors in maize.”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat production was highest under three-year and four-year rotations.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- three-year and four-year crop rotationse0
- Outcome
- productione0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In wheat, the highest production was achieved in the three-year and four-year crop rotations”
Claim · model-written summary
Maize yield was maximum under the three-year rotation.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“in maize the maximum yield was achieved in the three-year crop rotation, four-year crop rotation and four-year crop rotation with jumping plot rotation after wheat.”
Claim · model-written summary
Maize yield was maximum under the four-year rotation.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“in maize the maximum yield was achieved in the three-year crop rotation, four-year crop rotation and four-year crop rotation with jumping plot rotation after wheat.”
Claim · model-written summary
Maize yield was maximum under the four-year rotation with a jumping plot after wheat.
- Treatment
- four-year crop rotation with jumping plot rotation after wheate0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“in maize the maximum yield was achieved in the three-year crop rotation, four-year crop rotation and four-year crop rotation with jumping plot rotation after wheat.”
The same questions in other papers
Triticum aestivum · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
98 papers more in this group
See all 102 papers →rotation · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
43 papers more in this group
See all 47 papers →rotation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
253 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- negative
318 papers more in this group
See all 322 papers →rotation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 83 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
341 papers more in this group
See all 345 papers →fertilization · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
1,195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 149 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
1,361 papers more in this group
See all 1,365 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.