Abstract
Abstract A field experiment was conducted on sulfur deficient soil during kharif dry seasons of 1993, 1994, and 1995 to study the comparative efficacy of selected sources of sulfur to groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). The results of the experiment were tested on farm trial in cultivator's field during the kharif season of 1999. The yield of groundnut crop in experimental field increased significantly with increasing levels of sulfur up to 40 kg S ha−1. Among the various sources tested, gypsum was the best with respect to yield, followed by single super phosphate and ammonium sulfate. In on‐farm trial the application of gypsum at 20 kg S ha−1 increased the yield parameters and yield over un‐treated control. The residual effect of different sulfur sources on wheat (Triticum aestivum) grain yield, the effect of treatments was non significant but the levels of sulfur and the interaction between source and levels were significant.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Groundnut yield increased significantly with sulfur levels up to 40 kg S ha−1.
- Taxon
- groundnut crop
Arachis hypogaeae0 - Treatment
- increasing levels of sulfur up to 40 kg S ha−1e0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Setting
- experimental fielde0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The yield of groundnut crop in experimental field increased significantly with increasing levels of sulfur up to 40 kg S ha−1”
Claim · model-written summary
Gypsum was the best sulfur source for groundnut yield.
- Taxon
- GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- gypsume0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- beste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Among the various sources tested, gypsum was the best with respect to yield”
t0“Groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
Single super phosphate ranked after gypsum for groundnut yield.
- Taxon
- GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- single super phosphatee0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- followed bye0
- Comparator
- gypsume0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“gypsum was the best with respect to yield, followed by single super phosphate and ammonium sulfate”
t0“Groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
Ammonium sulfate ranked after single super phosphate for groundnut yield.
- Taxon
- GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- ammonium sulfatee0
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- followed bye0
- Comparator
- single super phosphatee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“followed by single super phosphate and ammonium sulfate”
e1“gypsum was the best with respect to yield”
t0“Groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
On farm, gypsum at 20 kg S ha−1 increased groundnut yield parameters and yield over untreated control.
- Taxon
- GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- gypsum at 20 kg S ha−1e0
- Outcome
- yield parameters and yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- un‐treated controle0
- Setting
- on‐farm triale0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In on‐farm trial the application of gypsum at 20 kg S ha−1 increased the yield parameters and yield over un‐treated control”
t0“Groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfur source treatments had a nonsignificant residual effect on wheat grain yield.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- different sulfur sourcese0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The residual effect of different sulfur sources on wheat (Triticum aestivum) grain yield, the effect of treatments was non significant”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfur level had a significant residual effect on wheat grain yield, with direction unstated.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- levels of sulfure0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The residual effect of different sulfur sources on wheat (Triticum aestivum) grain yield, the effect of treatments was non significant but the levels of sulfur and the interaction between source and levels were significant”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfur source-by-level interaction significantly affected residual wheat grain yield, with direction unstated.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- interaction between source and levelse0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The residual effect of different sulfur sources on wheat (Triticum aestivum) grain yield, the effect of treatments was non significant but the levels of sulfur and the interaction between source and levels were significant”
The same questions in other papers
sulfur atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 124 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
144 papers more in this group
See all 148 papers →sulfur atom · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
58 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
55 papers more in this group
See all 59 papers →lime · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
132 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
138 papers more in this group
See all 142 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.