Paper · 2007 · Journal of Applied Entomology

Oviposition deterrence of shoots and essential oils of Minthostachys spp. (Lamiaceae) against the potato tuber moth

P. C. Guerra; I. Y. Molina; E. Yábar; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract: The potato tuber moth is a noxious pest of potato in stores, where the use of repellent plants is an environmentally sound alternative to the application of chemical pesticides. We evaluated the protective effect of native Minthostachys species (Lamiaceae) against tuber infestation by the potato tuber moth in a rustic store in Cusco, Perú. We covered potato tubers with dried shoots of Minthostachys spicata and Minthostachys glabrescens and compared tuber damage with a control treatment of maize straw. We also conducted a no‐choice oviposition bioassay in the laboratory, testing the oviposition deterrence of essential oils of M. spicata , M. glabrescens and Minthostachys mollis at natural concentrations. We recorded the number of eggs laid by mated moths on filter paper treated with essential oils of each of the three species and on two control treatments: hexane and untreated blank. Finally, we tested for differences in oviposition deterrence among five full‐sib families of potato tuber moth raised under identical conditions. We found that dried, chopped leaves and flowers of Minthostachys species reduced the percentage of tuber damage in stores in comparison with the control (5% vs. 12%), but no difference in protection was found between species. Essential oils at natural concentrations deterred moth oviposition, reducing the number of eggs laid by about 80% compared with the control treatments; again, there were no significant differences between Minthostachys species. Finally, whereas we detected among‐family variation in oviposition on filter papers treated with essential oils, no difference was found in the number of eggs laid on control substrates. Therefore, there was genetic variation for oviposition deterrence in the potato tuber moth and resistance to repellent plants might evolve thereafter.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minthostachys leaves and flowers reduced potato tuber damage in stores from 12% to 5%.

Treatment
dried, chopped leaves and flowers of Minthostachys speciese0
Interactor
potato tuber motht0pest
Outcome
percentage of tuber damagee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
5% vs. 12%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dried, chopped leaves and flowers of Minthostachys species reduced the percentage of tuber damage in stores in comparison with the control (5% vs. 12%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1217 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato tuber moth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tuber protection did not differ between Minthostachys species.

Treatment
Minthostachys speciese0
Interactor
potato tuber motht0pest
Outcome
protectione0
Direction
no differencee0
Comparator
speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dried, chopped leaves and flowers of Minthostachys species reduced the percentage of tuber damage in stores in comparison with the control (5% vs. 12%), but no difference in protection was found between species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1276 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato tuber moth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minthostachys essential oils reduced moth egg laying by about 80% relative to controls.

Treatment
Essential oils at natural concentrationse0
Interactor
potato tuber motht0pest
Outcome
number of eggs laide0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
about 80%e0
Comparator
control treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Essential oils at natural concentrations deterred moth oviposition, reducing the number of eggs laid by about 80% compared with the control treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1428 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato tuber moth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Oviposition deterrence did not significantly differ between Minthostachys species.

Treatment
Minthostachys speciese0
Interactor
potato tuber motht0pest
Outcome
no significant differencese0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Comparator
Minthostachys speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were no significant differences between Minthostachys species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1437–1504 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato tuber moth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–115 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moth families varied in oviposition on oil-treated paper.

Treatment
essential oilse0
Interactor
potato tuber motht0pest
Outcome
oviposition on filter paperse0
Direction
variatione0

Not reportedMaterial

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we detected among‐family variation in oviposition on filter papers treated with essential oils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1617 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato tuber moth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–115 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moth families did not differ in egg laying on control substrates.

Interactor
potato tuber motht0pest
Outcome
number of eggs laid on control substratese0
Direction
no differencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no difference was found in the number of eggs laid on control substrates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1619–1691 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato tuber moth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–115 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer genetic variation in moth response to repellent plants and possible resistance evolution.

Interactor
potato tuber mothe0pest
Outcome
genetic variation for oviposition deterrencee0
Qualifier
resistance to repellent plants might evolve thereaftere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was genetic variation for oviposition deterrence in the potato tuber moth and resistance to repellent plants might evolve thereafter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1704–1842 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato tuber moth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–115 · show in text ↑

botanical · pest · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 32 positive, 4 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

processing · pest · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.