Paper · 2010 · Annales Botanici Fennici

Habitat Quality and Population Size as Determinants of Performance of Two Endangered Hemiparasites

Roosa Leimu

9
claims
13
verbatim quotes
14
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Optimal understanding of biodiversity threats must consider the effects of population size and habitat quality on population viability. I examined the effects and relative importance of these factors for the performance of two endangered hemiparasitic plants, Melampyrum cristatum and M. arvense in Finland. I surveyed 18 M. cristatum and 14 M. arvense populations. Both habitat quality and population size influenced the performance of M. cristatum. By contrast, the performance of M. arvense was determined by habitat quality, but not influenced by population size. Habitat quality was improved in managed M. cristatum populations, which translated into greater hemiparasite performance in these populations. Degradation of suitable habitats has likely decreased the performance of the two endangered hemiparasites, resulting in reduced population sizes. The results highlight the importance of considering simultaneously population size effects and habitat quality. Habitat management seems to be the key to sustain or increase the viability of the hemiparasite populations, but the timing and intensity of management should be considered.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Habitat quality influenced M. cristatum performance.

Taxon
M. cristatumMelampyrum cristatume0
Outcome
performance of M. cristatume0
Setting
habitat qualitye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Melampyrum cristatum
Melampyrum cristatum · TaxonBotpot12 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both habitat quality and population size influenced the performance of M. cristatum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–450 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Population size influenced M. cristatum performance.

Taxon
M. cristatumMelampyrum cristatume0
Material
population sizee0
Outcome
performance of M. cristatume0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Melampyrum cristatum
Melampyrum cristatum · TaxonBotpot12 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both habitat quality and population size influenced the performance of M. cristatum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–450 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Habitat quality determined M. arvense performance.

Taxon
M. arvenseMelampyrum arvensee0
Outcome
performance of M. arvensee0
Setting
habitat qualitye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Melampyrum arvense
Melampyrum arvense · TaxonBernd Haynold · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the performance of M. arvense was determined by habitat quality, but not influenced by population size.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–567 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Population size did not influence M. arvense performance.

Taxon
M. arvenseMelampyrum arvensee0
Material
population sizee0
Outcome
performance of M. arvensee0
Direction
not influencede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Melampyrum arvense
Melampyrum arvense · TaxonBernd Haynold · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the performance of M. arvense was determined by habitat quality, but not influenced by population size.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–567 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Management improved M. cristatum habitat quality.

Taxon
M. cristatumMelampyrum cristatume0
Treatment
managede0
Outcome
Habitat qualitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Melampyrum cristatum
Melampyrum cristatum · TaxonBotpot12 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Habitat quality was improved in managed M. cristatum populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–632 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Managed M. cristatum populations had greater performance.

Taxon
M. cristatumMelampyrum cristatume1
Treatment
managede1
Outcome
hemiparasite performancee0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Melampyrum cristatum
Melampyrum cristatum · TaxonBotpot12 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which translated into greater hemiparasite performance in these populations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–710 · show in text ↑
e1

“managed M. cristatum populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–632 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Habitat degradation likely decreased performance of both hemiparasites.

Taxon
Melampyrum cristatum and M. arvenseMelampyrum arvenseMelampyrum cristatume1
Outcome
performance of the two endangered hemiparasitese0
Direction
decreasede0
Setting
Degradation of suitable habitatse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Melampyrum arvense
Melampyrum arvense · TaxonBernd Haynold · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Melampyrum cristatum
Melampyrum cristatum · TaxonBotpot12 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Degradation of suitable habitats has likely decreased the performance of the two endangered hemiparasites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–816 · show in text ↑
e1

“Melampyrum cristatum and M. arvense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–295 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced performance likely resulted in reduced population sizes.

Taxon
Melampyrum cristatum and M. arvenseMelampyrum arvenseMelampyrum cristatume1
Outcome
population sizese0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
Degradation of suitable habitatse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Melampyrum arvense
Melampyrum arvense · TaxonBernd Haynold · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Melampyrum cristatum
Melampyrum cristatum · TaxonBotpot12 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resulting in reduced population sizes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–856 · show in text ↑
e1

“Melampyrum cristatum and M. arvense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–295 · show in text ↑
e2

“Degradation of suitable habitats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–743 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend habitat management to sustain or increase hemiparasite population viability.

Taxon
hemiparasite populationse0
Outcome
Habitat management seems to be the key to sustain or increase the viabilitye0
Qualifier
timing and intensity of management should be considerede0

Verbatim

e0

“Habitat management seems to be the key to sustain or increase the viability of the hemiparasite populations, but the timing and intensity of management should be considered.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1142 · show in text ↑