Paper · 2015 · Ecology Letters

Abundance and generalisation in mutualistic networks: solving the chicken‐and‐egg dilemma

Hugo Fort; Diego P. Vázquez; Boon Leong Lan

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
101
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A frequent observation in plant-animal mutualistic networks is that abundant species tend to be more generalised, interacting with a broader range of interaction partners than rare species. Uncovering the causal relationship between abundance and generalisation has been hindered by a chicken-and-egg dilemma: is generalisation a by-product of being abundant, or does high abundance result from generalisation? Here, we analyse a database of plant-pollinator and plant-seed disperser networks, and provide strong evidence that the causal link between abundance and generalisation is uni-directional. Specifically, species appear to be generalists because they are more abundant, but the converse, that is that species become more abundant because they are generalists, is not supported by our analysis. Furthermore, null model analyses suggest that abundant species interact with many other species simply because they are more likely to encounter potential interaction partners.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More abundant species appeared more generalised in mutualistic networks.

Taxon
plante1
Outcome
generalistse0
Direction
more abundante0
Comparator
more abundante0

Verbatim

e0

“species appear to be generalists because they are more abundant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–677 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant-pollinator and plant-seed disperser networks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–492 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Analysis did not support generalisation causing greater abundance.

Taxon
plante1
Outcome
more abundante0
Comparator
generalistse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“species become more abundant because they are generalists, is not supported by our analysis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–801 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant-pollinator and plant-seed disperser networks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–492 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Null models suggested abundance increases encounters with interaction partners.

Taxon
plante1
Outcome
interact with many other speciese0
Qualifier
more likely to encounter potential interaction partnerse0

Verbatim

e0

“abundant species interact with many other species simply because they are more likely to encounter potential interaction partners”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–978 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant-pollinator and plant-seed disperser networks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–492 · show in text ↑