Paper · 2013 · Scientific Papers - Series A, Agronomy

THE INFLUENCE OF SOIL TYPE AND FERTILIZATION DOSES ON THE YIELD OF WINTER BARLEY

Daniela Trifan; Marcel Bularda; I. Vişinescu

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Purpose of this study was to establish the most efficient polifactorial combination represented by soil type x dose of fertilizer for cultivation of winter barley Cardinal and Maresal varieties, in order to obtain higher production in terms of quantity and quality, in climate conditions of Braila Plain, which is a very favorable area for this crop. The three experimental factors had two graduations, namely: A (soil type) with A1 – typical Chernozem and A2 Solonetz, B (variety) with B1 – Cardinal and B2 – Maresal, and C (dose of fertilizer) with C1 – economic optimum dose calculated for chernozem, C2 – economic optimum dose calculated for Solonetz and C3 – unfertilized. In terms of economic efficiency, the largest profit of studied variants was registered by Maresal variety cultivated on Chernozem, fertilized with optimum dose for Solonetz, followed in descending order by Maresal variety cultivated on Chernozem fertilized with optimum dose for Chernozem and Cardinal variety grown on Chernozem fertilized with optimal dose calculated for Solonetz. The research found that the Maresal variety is more productive than Cardinal variety on both soil type from experience, but Cardinal variety can obtain a high production increase if additional fertilization. We studied also the correlations between soil quality indices and interaction of experimental factors studied, to determine the most efficient systems (soil type x level of fertilization x variety), while Braila Plain.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maresal on Chernozem with the Solonetz optimum fertilizer dose had the largest profit.

Taxon
WINTER BARLEYHordeum vulgaret0
Material
Maresale0
Treatment
optimum dose for Solonetze0
Outcome
profite0
Direction
largeste0
Setting
Chernozeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the largest profit of studied variants was registered by Maresal variety cultivated on Chernozem, fertilized with optimum dose for Solonetz”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–850 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER BARLEY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–80 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maresal on Chernozem with the Chernozem optimum dose ranked second in profit.

Taxon
WINTER BARLEYHordeum vulgaret0
Material
Maresale0
Treatment
optimum dose for Chernozeme0
Outcome
descending ordere0
Setting
Chernozeme0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed in descending order by Maresal variety cultivated on Chernozem fertilized with optimum dose for Chernozem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–966 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER BARLEY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–80 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cardinal on Chernozem with the Solonetz optimum dose ranked next in profit.

Taxon
WINTER BARLEYHordeum vulgaret0
Material
Cardinale0
Treatment
optimal dose calculated for Solonetze0
Setting
Chernozeme0

Not reportedOutcome

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cardinal variety grown on Chernozem fertilized with optimal dose calculated for Solonetz”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1059 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER BARLEY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–80 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maresal was more productive than Cardinal on both soils.

Taxon
WINTER BARLEYHordeum vulgaret0
Material
Maresale0
Outcome
productivee0
Direction
more productivee0
Comparator
Cardinale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Maresal variety is more productive than Cardinal variety on both soil type”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1163 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER BARLEY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Additional fertilization increased Cardinal production.

Taxon
WINTER BARLEYHordeum vulgaret0
Material
Cardinale0
Treatment
additional fertilizatione0
Outcome
productione0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cardinal variety can obtain a high production increase if additional fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1267 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER BARLEY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–80 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 473 positive, 77 negative or no effect

472 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.