Paper · 1990 · PubMed

Chemical Control of Hoplolaimus columbus on Cotton and Soybean.

D P Schmitt; J E Bailey

3
claims
8
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Seven experiments, three on soybean and four on cotton, were conducted in Hoplolaimus columbus-infested soil in southern North Carolina to determine the benefits of chemical soil treatment. Locations were selected to give a range of initial population (Pi) densities. Soil fumigation with 1,3-D and soil treatment with a combination of aldicarb plus fenamiphos (1.1 kg a.i./ha) each provided good control of this nematode. Yield responses considered to be significant were achieved only on the high Pi site.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil fumigation with 1,3-D gave good control of Hoplolaimus columbus.

Taxon
Cotton and SoybeanGossypium hirsutumGlycine maxt0
Treatment
Soil fumigation with 1,3-De1
Interactor
Hoplolaimus columbusHoplolaimus columbuse0pest
Outcome
control of this nematodee1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton and Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“Hoplolaimus columbus-infested soil in southern North Carolina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–135 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soil fumigation with 1,3-D and soil treatment with a combination of aldicarb plus fenamiphos (1.1 kg a.i./ha) each provided good control of this nematode”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–421 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil treatment with aldicarb plus fenamiphos (1.1 kg a.i./ha) gave good control of Hoplolaimus columbus.

Taxon
Cotton and SoybeanGossypium hirsutumGlycine maxt0
Treatment
aldicarb plus fenamiphos (1.1 kg a.i./ha)e1
Interactor
Hoplolaimus columbusHoplolaimus columbuse0pest
Outcome
control of this nematodee1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton and Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“Hoplolaimus columbus-infested soil in southern North Carolina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–135 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soil fumigation with 1,3-D and soil treatment with a combination of aldicarb plus fenamiphos (1.1 kg a.i./ha) each provided good control of this nematode”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–421 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield responses to the chemical treatments were significant only on the high initial population site.

Taxon
Cotton and SoybeanGossypium hirsutumGlycine maxt0
Outcome
Yield responsese2
Setting
high Pi sitee2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton and Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–62 · show in text ↑
e2

“Yield responses considered to be significant were achieved only on the high Pi site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–506 · show in text ↑

fenamiphos · Hoplolaimus columbus · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

aldicarb · Hoplolaimus columbus · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fenamiphos · Hoplolaimus columbus · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

aldicarb · Hoplolaimus columbus · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

solarization · Hoplolaimus columbus · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

solarization · Hoplolaimus columbus · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.