Paper · 1997 · Plant Disease

Ascochyta fabae and A. lentis: Host Specificity, Teleomorphs (Didymella), Hybrid Analysis, and Taxonomic Status

W. J. Kaiser; B.-C. Wang; J. D. Rogers

6
claims
7
verbatim quotes
75
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Isolates of Ascochyta fabae from faba bean (Vicia faba) and A. lentis from lentil (Lens culinaris) collected from different countries were used in this study. The Didymella teleomorph (sexual state) of each fungus was induced to develop and mature on inoculated sterile lentil stems. Both fungi were heterothallic, with two mating types, designated MAT1-1 and MAT1-2. When certain isolates of A. fabae and A. lentis were crossed, hybrid pseudothecia developed. Growth, sporulation, colony appearance, morphology, and pathogenicity of the hybrid progeny frequently differed greatly from the parent isolates. Inoculations with single-ascospore progeny from matings among compatible isolates of A. fabae caused disease in faba bean but not in lentil; inoculations with single-ascospore progeny from matings among compatible isolates of A. lentis incited disease in lentil but not in faba bean. Inoculations with single-ascospore progeny from crosses between faba bean and lentil isolates did not induce disease in either host. Asci from crosses between A. fabae and A. lentis mostly contained fewer than eight ascospores that were, on average, larger than those from eight-spored asci. Matings among certain isolates of A. fabae resulted in production of pseudothecia with ascospores considerably larger than is typical for D. fabae. Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) banding patterns of Ascochyta isolates from faba bean and lentil are clearly different, and banding patterns from hybrid progeny from crosses between A. fabae and A. lentis confirmed hybridity. RAPD markers proved useful in supporting identifications of ascospore isolates from faba bean to known Ascochyta species. Dendrogram analysis indicated similarity between the two fungal species was low. The pathogenicity tests, morphological characteristics, and RAPD markers indicate that A. fabae and A. lentis represent distinct taxa. D. lentis, with its anamorph, A. lentis, is proposed as a new species that is distinct from D. fabae, with its anamorph, A. fabae.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. fabae mating progeny caused disease in faba bean.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
Inoculations with single-ascospore progeny from matings among compatible isolates of A. fabaee0
Interactor
A. fabaeAscochyta fabaee0pathogen
Outcome
disease in faba beane0
Direction
causede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ascochyta fabae
Ascochyta fabae · InteractorJerzy Opioła · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculations with single-ascospore progeny from matings among compatible isolates of A. fabae caused disease in faba bean but not in lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–746 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. fabae mating progeny did not cause disease in lentil.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
Inoculations with single-ascospore progeny from matings among compatible isolates of A. fabaee0
Interactor
A. fabaeAscochyta fabaee0pathogen
Outcome
diseasee0
Direction
note0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ascochyta fabae
Ascochyta fabae · InteractorJerzy Opioła · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculations with single-ascospore progeny from matings among compatible isolates of A. fabae caused disease in faba bean but not in lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–746 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. lentis mating progeny caused disease in lentil.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
inoculations with single-ascospore progeny from matings among compatible isolates of A. lentise0
Interactor
A. lentisAscochyta lentise0pathogen
Outcome
disease in lentile0
Direction
incitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculations with single-ascospore progeny from matings among compatible isolates of A. lentis incited disease in lentil but not in faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. lentis mating progeny did not cause disease in faba bean.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
inoculations with single-ascospore progeny from matings among compatible isolates of A. lentise0
Interactor
A. lentisAscochyta lentise0pathogen
Outcome
diseasee0
Direction
note0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculations with single-ascospore progeny from matings among compatible isolates of A. lentis incited disease in lentil but not in faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid progeny did not cause disease in either faba bean or lentil.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
Inoculations with single-ascospore progeny from crosses between faba bean and lentil isolatese0
Outcome
diseasee0
Direction
did not inducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculations with single-ascospore progeny from crosses between faba bean and lentil isolates did not induce disease in either host”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1022 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid progeny did not cause disease in lentil.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
Inoculations with single-ascospore progeny from crosses between faba bean and lentil isolatese0
Outcome
diseasee0
Direction
did not inducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculations with single-ascospore progeny from crosses between faba bean and lentil isolates did not induce disease in either host”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1022 · show in text ↑
t0

“from lentil (Lens culinaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 70–98 · show in text ↑

inoculation · disease · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 10 positive, 8 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

inoculation · disease · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 19 positive, 4 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.