Paper · 2006 · HortTechnology

Carrot Yield, Quality, and Storability in Relation to Preplant and Residual Nitrogen on Mineral and Organic Soils

Sean M. Westerveld; Mary Ruth McDonald; Alan W. McKeown

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
21
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The Nutrient Management Act (NMA) established in the province of Ontario in 2002 has prompted a re-evaluation of nitrogen (N) management practices. However, N management research in Ontario is currently outdated. The experiment in this 3-year study was designed to establish the yield response of carrot ( Daucus carota ) to N fertilization on mineral and organic soils and identify the relative yield effects of preplant and residual soil N. In 2002, N was applied at 0%, 50%, 100%, 150%, and 200% of recommended N application rates in Ontario as ammonium nitrate (organic soil: 60 kg·ha -1 preplant; mineral soil: 110 kg·ha -1 split 66% preplant/33% sidedress). Experimental units were split in half in 2003 and 2004, and N was applied to one half in 2003 and both halves in 2004 to identify the effects of residual N from the previous season on yield. Crop stand, yield, and quality were assessed at harvest, and storability was assessed by placing carrots into cold storage for 6 months. Nitrogen application rate had no effect on the yield, quality, or storability of carrots grown on organic soil. On mineral soil there were no effects of applied N in the first year of the 3-year study. In the second and third year on mineral soil, yield increased in response to increasing N, up to 200% and 91% of the recommended application rate, respectively, based on the regression equations. Yield declined above 91% of the recommended application rate in the third year due to a decrease in stand at higher N application rates. There were no effects of N on carrot quality or storability on mineral soil. On mineral soil, residual N from the 2002 season had more effect on yield at harvest in 2003 than N applied in 2003. This major effect of residual soil N on yield provides an explanation for the lack of yield response to preplant N application in previous studies conducted in temperate regions. These results indicate that there is no single N recommendation that is appropriate for all years on mineral soil. Assessing the availability of N from the soil at different depths at seeding is recommended to determine the need for N application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen rate did not affect carrot yield, quality or storability on organic soil.

Taxon
carrotsDaucus carotae0
Treatment
Nitrogen application ratee0
Outcome
yield, quality, or storabilitye0
Direction
no effecte0
Setting
organic soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen application rate had no effect on the yield, quality, or storability of carrots grown on organic soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied nitrogen had no effect on mineral soil in the first year.

Treatment
applied Ne0t0
Outcome
no effects of applied Ne0t0
Direction
no effectse0t0
Setting
mineral soile0t0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On mineral soil there were no effects of applied N in the first year of the 3-year study.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1193 · show in text ↑
t0

“Carrot Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–12 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral soil carrot yield increased with N rate up to 200% of the recommendation in year two.

Treatment
increasing Ne0t0
Outcome
yielde0t0
Direction
increasede0t0
Value
200%e0t0
Qualifier
second and third yeare0t0
Setting
mineral soile0t0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the second and third year on mineral soil, yield increased in response to increasing N, up to 200% and 91% of the recommended application rate, respectively, based on the regression equations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1389 · show in text ↑
t0

“Carrot Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–12 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral soil carrot yield increased with N rate up to 91% of the recommendation in year three.

Treatment
increasing Ne0t0
Outcome
yielde0t0
Direction
increasede0t0
Value
91% of the recommended application ratee0t0
Qualifier
third yeare0t0
Setting
mineral soile0t0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the second and third year on mineral soil, yield increased in response to increasing N, up to 200% and 91% of the recommended application rate, respectively, based on the regression equations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1389 · show in text ↑
t0

“Carrot Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–12 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Above 91% of the recommendation, third-year yield declined because stand decreased at higher N rates.

Treatment
higher N application ratese0t0
Outcome
Yielde0t0
Direction
declinede0t0
Qualifier
decrease in stande0t0
Comparator
91% of the recommended application ratee0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield declined above 91% of the recommended application rate in the third year due to a decrease in stand at higher N application rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1390–1526 · show in text ↑
t0

“Carrot Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–12 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen had no effect on carrot quality or storability on mineral soil.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae0
Treatment
Ne0
Outcome
carrot quality or storabilitye0
Direction
no effectse0
Setting
mineral soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no effects of N on carrot quality or storability on mineral soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1527–1603 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual N from 2002 affected mineral-soil yield in 2003 more than N applied in 2003.

Treatment
residual N from the 2002 seasone0t0
Outcome
yield at harvest in 2003e0t0
Direction
more effecte0t0
Comparator
N applied in 2003e0t0
Setting
mineral soile0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On mineral soil, residual N from the 2002 season had more effect on yield at harvest in 2003 than N applied in 2003.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1604–1720 · show in text ↑
t0

“Carrot Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–12 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

No single mineral-soil nitrogen recommendation suits all years.

Taxon
CarrotDaucus carotat0
Outcome
no single N recommendation that is appropriate for all years on mineral soil.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there is no single N recommendation that is appropriate for all years on mineral soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1928–2014 · show in text ↑
t0

“Carrot Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–12 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Assess soil nitrogen availability at different depths at seeding to decide N application.

Taxon
CarrotDaucus carotat0
Outcome
Assessing the availability of N from the soil at different depths at seedinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Assessing the availability of N from the soil at different depths at seeding is recommended to determine the need for N application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2015–2147 · show in text ↑
t0

“Carrot Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–12 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Daucus carota (carrot)Results differ

32 papers: 24 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

climate site · yield · Daucus carota (carrot)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

nitrogen · quality: postharvest · Daucus carota (carrot)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.