Paper · 1995 · Annals of Botany

Shoot Growth and Mortality Patterns of Urtica dioica, a Clonal Forb

T Hara

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
26
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The growth and mortality patterns of the clonal forb Urtica dioica were investigated at the level of the individual shoot in two growing seasons, 1991 and 1992, in a natural stand. Shoot height and diameter at ground level of each shoot tagged in spring were measured repeatedly five times during the growing season. Dry weights of these repeatedly measured shoots were estimated using an allometric relationship between dry weight, height and diameter of harvested shoots. A large decrease in shoot density occurred with stand development from the beginning of the growing season in both the years: (1) shoot survival rate was about 30% at the end of the growing season; (2) shoot mortality rate per 10 × 10 cm subplot between censuses was positively dependent on shoot density per subplot; (3) the mortality rate of individual shoots was negatively dependent on shoot size (height, diameter and weight) at each growing stage, suggesting one-sided competition between living and dying shoots; (4) shoot size (height, diameter and weight) variability in terms of the coefficient of variation and skewness decreased in accordance with shoot mortality. Symmetric competition between living shoots was detected by regression analysis based on a model for individual shoot growth considering the degree of competitive asymmetry. However, the competitive effect on individual shoot growth was very small (nearly absent). The mortality pattern of Urtica dioica indicates that shoot self-thinning occurred from the early growing stage as in non-clonal crowded monospecific stands, and contrasts with many clonal plants where shoot self-thinning rarely occurs or, if any, is confined only to a short period of the later growing stage. The pattern of growth and competition between living shoots of Urtica dioica contrasts with non-clonal crowded plants undergoing intense competition (usually asymmetric) between individuals, but is a common feature of many clonal plants where shoot competition is supposed to be reduced by 'physiological integration' between shoots. These form a new pattern not reported yet for clonal plants. It is pointed out that clonal plants show a wider spectrum of the growth, competition and mortality patterns of shoots than non-clonals. Some possible mechanisms for the pattern of Urtica dioica are discussed.Copyright 1995, 1999 Academic Press

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot survival rate was about 30% at the end of the growing season.

Taxon
Urtica dioicaUrtica dioicat0
Outcome
shoot survival ratee0
Value
about 30%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Urtica dioica
Urtica dioica · TaxonSkalle-Per Hedenhös · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Urtica dioica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–52 · show in text ↑
e0

“shoot survival rate was about 30% at the end of the growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–670 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot mortality rate between censuses was positively dependent on shoot density per subplot.

Taxon
Urtica dioicaUrtica dioicat0
Treatment
shoot density per subplote1
Outcome
shoot mortality ratee1
Direction
positively dependente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Urtica dioica
Urtica dioica · TaxonSkalle-Per Hedenhös · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Urtica dioica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–52 · show in text ↑
e1

“shoot mortality rate per 10 × 10 cm subplot between censuses was positively dependent on shoot density per subplot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–790 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mortality rate of individual shoots was negatively dependent on shoot size.

Taxon
Urtica dioicaUrtica dioicat0
Treatment
shoot size (height, diameter and weight)e2
Outcome
mortality rate of individual shootse2
Direction
negatively dependente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Urtica dioica
Urtica dioica · TaxonSkalle-Per Hedenhös · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Urtica dioica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–52 · show in text ↑
e2

“the mortality rate of individual shoots was negatively dependent on shoot size (height, diameter and weight) at each growing stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–926 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot size variability decreased in accordance with shoot mortality.

Taxon
Urtica dioicaUrtica dioicat0
Treatment
shoot mortalitye3
Outcome
shoot size (height, diameter and weight) variabilitye3
Direction
decreasede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Urtica dioica
Urtica dioica · TaxonSkalle-Per Hedenhös · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Urtica dioica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–52 · show in text ↑
e3

“shoot size (height, diameter and weight) variability in terms of the coefficient of variation and skewness decreased in accordance with shoot mortality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1149 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Symmetric competition between living shoots was detected.

Taxon
Urtica dioicaUrtica dioicat0
Outcome
Symmetric competition between living shootse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Urtica dioica
Urtica dioica · TaxonSkalle-Per Hedenhös · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Urtica dioica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–52 · show in text ↑
e4

“Symmetric competition between living shoots was detected by regression analysis based on a model for individual shoot growth considering the degree of competitive asymmetry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1323 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The competitive effect on individual shoot growth was very small, nearly absent.

Taxon
Urtica dioicaUrtica dioicat0
Outcome
competitive effect on individual shoot growthe5
Qualifier
very small (nearly absent)e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Urtica dioica
Urtica dioica · TaxonSkalle-Per Hedenhös · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Urtica dioica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–52 · show in text ↑
e5

“However, the competitive effect on individual shoot growth was very small (nearly absent)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1414 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot self-thinning occurred from the early growing stage, as in non-clonal crowded monospecific stands.

Taxon
Urtica dioicaUrtica dioicat0
Organ / stage
early growing stagee6
Outcome
shoot self-thinninge6
Qualifier
as in non-clonal crowded monospecific standse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Urtica dioica
Urtica dioica · TaxonSkalle-Per Hedenhös · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Urtica dioica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–52 · show in text ↑
e6

“shoot self-thinning occurred from the early growing stage as in non-clonal crowded monospecific stands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1470–1572 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot density showed a large decrease with stand development in both years.

Taxon
Urtica dioicaUrtica dioicat0
Outcome
shoot densitye7
Qualifier
A large decreasee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Urtica dioica
Urtica dioica · TaxonSkalle-Per Hedenhös · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Urtica dioica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–52 · show in text ↑
e7

“A large decrease in shoot density occurred with stand development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–539 · show in text ↑