Paper · 1999 · Molecular Ecology

Molecular diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonising Hyacinthoides non‐scripta (bluebell) in a seminatural woodland

T. Helgason; A. H. Fitter; J. P. W. Young

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
233
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi form symbiotic associations with plant roots. Around 150 species have been described and it is becoming clear that many of these species have different functional properties. The species diversity of AM fungi actively growing in roots is therefore an important component of ecosystem diversity. However, it is difficult to identify AM fungi below the genus level from morphology in planta , as they possess few informative characters. We present here a molecular method for identifying infrageneric sequence types that estimate the taxonomic diversity of AM fungi present in actively growing roots. Bluebell roots were sampled from beneath two different canopy types, oak and sycamore, and DNA sequences were amplified from roots by the polymerase chain reaction with fungal‐specific primers for part of the small subunit ribosomal RNA gene. Restriction fragment length polymorphism among 141 clones was assessed and 62 clones were sequenced. When aligned, discrete sequence groups emerged that cluster into the three families of AM fungi: Acaulosporaceae, Gigasporaceae and Glomaceae. The sequence variation is consistent with rRNA secondary structure. The same sequence types were found at both sampling times. Frequencies of Scutellospora increased in December, and Acaulospora increased in abundance in July. Sites with a sycamore canopy show a reduced abundance of Acaulospora , and those with oak showed a reduced abundance of Glomus . These distribution patterns are consistent with previous morphological studies carried out in this woodland. The molecular method provides an alternative method of estimating the distribution and abundance of AM fungi, and has the potential to provide greater resolution at the infrageneric level.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A molecular PCR-RFLP method identified infrageneric AM fungal sequence types in bluebell roots, where morphology cannot.

Taxon
Bluebelle1
Outcome
identifying infrageneric sequence typese2
Comparator
morphology in plantae3

Verbatim

e1

“Bluebell roots were sampled from beneath two different canopy types, oak and sycamore”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–718 · show in text ↑
e2

“We present here a molecular method for identifying infrageneric sequence types that estimate the taxonomic diversity of AM fungi present in actively growing roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–631 · show in text ↑
e3

“it is difficult to identify AM fungi below the genus level from morphology in planta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–422 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Discrete AM fungal sequence groups clustered into the three families Acaulosporaceae, Gigasporaceae and Glomaceae.

Taxon
Bluebelle1
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae4symbiont
Outcome
discrete sequence groupse4
Qualifier
cluster into the three families of AM fungie4

Verbatim

e1

“Bluebell roots were sampled from beneath two different canopy types, oak and sycamore”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–718 · show in text ↑
e4

“When aligned, discrete sequence groups emerged that cluster into the three families of AM fungi: Acaulosporaceae, Gigasporaceae and Glomaceae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1118 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same AM fungal sequence types were found at both sampling times.

Taxon
Bluebelle1
Outcome
sequence typese5
Qualifier
at both sampling timese5

Verbatim

e1

“Bluebell roots were sampled from beneath two different canopy types, oak and sycamore”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–718 · show in text ↑
e5

“The same sequence types were found at both sampling times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1245 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Scutellospora frequencies increased in December.

Taxon
Bluebelle1
Interactor
ScutellosporaScutellosporae6symbiont
Outcome
Frequencies of Scutellosporae6
Direction
increasede6
Qualifier
in Decembere6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Scutellospora
Scutellospora · InteractorAmfitheatre · CC BY-SA 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Bluebell roots were sampled from beneath two different canopy types, oak and sycamore”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–718 · show in text ↑
e6

“Frequencies of Scutellospora increased in December, and Acaulospora increased in abundance in July”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1345 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acaulospora abundance increased in July.

Taxon
Bluebelle1
Interactor
AcaulosporaAcaulosporae6symbiont
Outcome
abundancee6
Direction
increasede6
Qualifier
in Julye6

Verbatim

e1

“Bluebell roots were sampled from beneath two different canopy types, oak and sycamore”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–718 · show in text ↑
e6

“Frequencies of Scutellospora increased in December, and Acaulospora increased in abundance in July”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1345 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sycamore canopy reduced the abundance of Acaulospora in bluebell roots.

Taxon
Bluebelle1
Treatment
sycamore canopye7
Interactor
AcaulosporaAcaulosporae7symbiont
Outcome
abundance of Acaulosporae7
Direction
reducede7

Verbatim

e1

“Bluebell roots were sampled from beneath two different canopy types, oak and sycamore”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–718 · show in text ↑
e7

“Sites with a sycamore canopy show a reduced abundance of Acaulospora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1415 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oak canopy reduced the abundance of Glomus in bluebell roots.

Taxon
Bluebelle1
Treatment
oake7
Interactor
GlomusGlomuse7symbiont
Outcome
abundance of Glomuse7
Direction
reducede7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glomus
Glomus · InteractorJerry Cooper · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Bluebell roots were sampled from beneath two different canopy types, oak and sycamore”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–718 · show in text ↑
e7

“those with oak showed a reduced abundance of Glomus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1422–1473 · show in text ↑