Paper · 2015 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Additive interactions of unrelated viruses in mixed infections of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp)

Imade Y. Nsa; Kehinde T. Kareem

16
claims
29
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study was carried out to determine the effects of single infections and co-infections of three unrelated viruses on three cowpea cultivars (one commercial cowpea cultivar "White" and 2 IITA lines; IT81D-985 and TVu 76). The plants were inoculated with Cowpea aphid-borne mosaic virus (CABMV), genus Potyvirus, Cowpea mottle virus (CMeV), genus Carmovirus and Southern bean mosaic virus (SBMV), genus Sobemovirus singly and in mixture (double and triple) at 10, 20, and 30 days after planting (DAP). The treated plants were assessed for susceptibility to the viruses, growth, and yield. In all cases of infection, early inoculation resulted in higher disease severity compared with late infection. The virus treated cowpea plants were relatively shorter than buffer inoculated control plants except the IT81D-985 plants that were taller and produced more foliage. Single infections by CABMV, CMeV, and SBMV led to a complete loss of seeds in the three cowpea cultivars at 10 DAP; only cultivar White produced some seeds at 30 DAP. Double and triple virus infections led to a total loss of seeds in all three cowpea cultivars. None of the virus infected IITA lines produced any seeds except IT81D-985 plants co-infected with CABMV and SBMV at 30 DAP with a reduction of 80%. Overall, the commercial cultivar "White" was the least susceptible to the virus treatments and produced the most yield (flowers, pods, and seeds). CABMV was the most aggressive of these viruses and early single inoculations with this virus resulted in the premature death of some of the seedlings. The presence of the Potyvirus, CABMV in the double virus infections did not appear to increase disease severity or yield loss. There was no strong evidence for synergistic interactions between the viruses in the double virus mixtures.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earlier virus inoculation produced higher disease severity than later infection.

Treatment
early inoculatione0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
late infectione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“early inoculation resulted in higher disease severity compared with late infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–700 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Virus-treated cowpea plants were shorter than buffer-inoculated controls.

Treatment
virus treatede0
Outcome
cowpea plantse0
Direction
shortere0
Comparator
buffer inoculated control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The virus treated cowpea plants were relatively shorter than buffer inoculated control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–795 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Virus-treated IT81D-985 plants were taller and had more foliage than controls.

Material
IT81D-985e0
Treatment
virus treatede1
Outcome
taller and produced more foliagee0
Direction
tallere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“except the IT81D-985 plants that were taller and produced more foliage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–866 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“The virus treated cowpea plants were relatively shorter than buffer inoculated control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–795 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single CABMV infection caused complete seed loss at 10 DAP.

Organ / stage
seedse0
Treatment
CABMVe0
Outcome
loss of seedse0
Direction
complete losse0
Qualifier
10 DAPe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Single infections by CABMV, CMeV, and SBMV led to a complete loss of seeds in the three cowpea cultivars at 10 DAP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–982 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single CMeV infection caused complete seed loss at 10 DAP.

Treatment
CMeVe0
Outcome
loss of seedse0
Direction
complete losse0
Qualifier
10 DAPe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Single infections by CABMV, CMeV, and SBMV led to a complete loss of seeds in the three cowpea cultivars at 10 DAP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–982 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single SBMV infection caused complete seed loss at 10 DAP.

Treatment
SBMVe0
Outcome
loss of seedse0
Direction
complete losse0
Qualifier
10 DAPe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Single infections by CABMV, CMeV, and SBMV led to a complete loss of seeds in the three cowpea cultivars at 10 DAP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–982 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only White produced some seeds following single infection at 30 DAP.

Material
Whitee0
Outcome
produced some seedse0
Qualifier
30 DAPe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only cultivar White produced some seeds at 30 DAP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1033 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double virus infection led to total seed loss in all three cultivars.

Treatment
Doublee0
Outcome
loss of seedse0
Direction
total losse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Double and triple virus infections led to a total loss of seeds in all three cowpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triple virus infection led to total seed loss in all three cultivars.

Treatment
triple virus infectionse0
Outcome
loss of seedse0
Direction
total losse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Double and triple virus infections led to a total loss of seeds in all three cowpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IT81D-985 co-infected with CABMV and SBMV at 30 DAP had an 80% seed reduction.

Material
IT81D-985e0
Treatment
co-infected with CABMV and SBMVe0
Outcome
seedse1
Direction
reductione0
Value
80%e0
Qualifier
30 DAPe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“IT81D-985 plants co-infected with CABMV and SBMV at 30 DAP with a reduction of 80%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1276 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“Single infections by CABMV, CMeV, and SBMV led to a complete loss of seeds in the three cowpea cultivars at 10 DAP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–982 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

White was least susceptible to virus treatments.

Material
Whitee0
Outcome
susceptible to the virus treatmentse0
Direction
leaste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the commercial cultivar "White" was the least susceptible to the virus treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1368 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

White produced the most flowers, pods and seeds.

Material
Whitee1
Outcome
yield (flowers, pods, and seeds)e0
Direction
moste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“produced the most yield (flowers, pods, and seeds)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1423 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“only cultivar White produced some seeds at 30 DAP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1033 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early single CABMV inoculation prematurely killed some seedlings.

Treatment
early single inoculationse0
Outcome
premature death of some of the seedlingse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“early single inoculations with this virus resulted in the premature death of some of the seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1476–1574 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CABMV in double infections did not appear to raise disease severity.

Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
did not appear to increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The presence of the Potyvirus, CABMV in the double virus infections did not appear to increase disease severity or yield loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1576–1701 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CABMV in double infections did not appear to raise yield loss.

Outcome
yield losse0
Direction
did not appear to increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The presence of the Potyvirus, CABMV in the double virus infections did not appear to increase disease severity or yield loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1576–1701 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double virus mixtures showed no strong evidence of synergy.

Outcome
synergistic interactions between the virusese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no strong evidence for synergistic interactions between the viruses in the double virus mixtures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1703–1809 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–72 · show in text ↑

inoculation · survival · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · disease · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 18 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.