Paper · 2015 · Indian Journal of Science and Technology

Integrated Effect of Land Configurations and Weed Management Regimes on Weed Dynamics and Performance of Urdbean (Vigna mungo L. Hepper) in an Alluvial Soil

Darvin Pal; Ashish Dwivedi; Raghuvir Singh; et al.

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out during kharif seasons of 2012 at CRC of SVPUA and T, Meerut to evaluate the weed dynamics and performance of urdbean under integrated effect of land configurations and weed management regimes. The experiment was laid out in split plot design with three replications. In main plot factor, four land configuration i.e. Line sowing (30 cm), Ridge method, Broad bed method (30 cm) and Broadcast sowing and in sub plot factor, four method of weed management practices, i.e. Pendimethalin @ 1.5 kg a.i /ha as pre-emergence, two hand weedings at (20 and 40 DAS), and Quizalofop ethyl @50 gm a.i /ha as post emergence and control were tested by using F test. The study on weeds and crop growth parameters was made on quadrate (1 m2 ) basis, whereas the yield attributes and yield were calculated on net plot area basis (12 m2 ). The economical studies were done on the basis of prevailing market prices of input and output. The results indicated that weed population and dry weight of weeds were significantly reduced with the application of Quizalofop ethyl @50 gm a.i /ha as post emergence over Pendimethalin @ 1.5 kg a.i /ha as pre-emergence, Two hand weedings at (20 & 40 DAS) and control. Plant population, growth parameters viz., plant height, number of trifoliate leaves and dry matter accumulation and yield attributes viz., number of pod plant-1 , 100 seed weight, biological yield, harvest index found superior by using Quizalofop ethyl @50 gm a.i /ha as post emergence than Pendimethalin @ 1.5 kg a.i /ha as pre-emergence, Two hand weedings at (20 & 40 DAS) and control. This treatment also fetched Rs. 40631 and 53753 net and gross return, respectively. Moreover, under land configurations, Broad bed method (30 cm) showed highest values of above parameters followed by Ridge method, Line sowing (30 cm), and Broadcast sowing. Apart from above it also bring significantly reduction in weed population and dry weight of weeds. Thus, broad bed method in combination with Quizalofop ethyl @50 g a.i. / ha as post emergence may be suggested for effective control of weeds in urdbean with maximum net return. Keywords: Alluvial Soil, Land Configurations, Urdbean, Weed Dynamics, Weed Management Regimes

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Post emergence quizalofop reduced weed population relative to the other weed management treatments.

Taxon
UrdbeanVigna mungot0
Treatment
Quizalofop ethyl @50 gm a.i /ha as post emergencee0
Outcome
weed populatione0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed population and dry weight of weeds were significantly reduced with the application of Quizalofop ethyl @50 gm a.i /ha as post emergence over Pendimethalin @ 1.5 kg a.i /ha as pre-emergence, Two hand weedings at (20 & 40 DAS) and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1219 · show in text ↑
t0

“Urdbean (Vigna mungo L. Hepper)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Post emergence quizalofop reduced dry weight of weeds relative to the other weed management treatments.

Taxon
UrdbeanVigna mungot0
Treatment
Quizalofop ethyl @50 gm a.i /ha as post emergencee0
Outcome
dry weight of weedse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed population and dry weight of weeds were significantly reduced with the application of Quizalofop ethyl @50 gm a.i /ha as post emergence over Pendimethalin @ 1.5 kg a.i /ha as pre-emergence, Two hand weedings at (20 & 40 DAS) and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1219 · show in text ↑
t0

“Urdbean (Vigna mungo L. Hepper)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quizalofop treatment was superior for Plant population.

Taxon
UrdbeanVigna mungot0
Treatment
Quizalofop ethyl @50 gm a.i /ha as post emergencee0
Outcome
Plant populatione0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant population, growth parameters viz., plant height, number of trifoliate leaves and dry matter accumulation and yield attributes viz., number of pod plant-1 , 100 seed weight, biological yield, harvest index found superior by using Quizalofop ethyl @50 gm a.i /ha as post emergence than Pendimethalin @ 1.5 kg a.i /ha as pre-emergence, Two hand weedings at (20 & 40 DAS) and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1607 · show in text ↑
t0

“Urdbean (Vigna mungo L. Hepper)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quizalofop treatment was superior for plant height, number of trifoliate leaves and dry matter accumulation.

Taxon
UrdbeanVigna mungot0
Treatment
Quizalofop ethyl @50 gm a.i /ha as post emergencee0
Outcome
plant height, number of trifoliate leaves and dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant population, growth parameters viz., plant height, number of trifoliate leaves and dry matter accumulation and yield attributes viz., number of pod plant-1 , 100 seed weight, biological yield, harvest index found superior by using Quizalofop ethyl @50 gm a.i /ha as post emergence than Pendimethalin @ 1.5 kg a.i /ha as pre-emergence, Two hand weedings at (20 & 40 DAS) and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1607 · show in text ↑
t0

“Urdbean (Vigna mungo L. Hepper)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quizalofop treatment was superior for number of pod plant-1 , 100 seed weight.

Taxon
UrdbeanVigna mungot0
Treatment
Quizalofop ethyl @50 gm a.i /ha as post emergencee0
Outcome
number of pod plant-1 , 100 seed weighte0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant population, growth parameters viz., plant height, number of trifoliate leaves and dry matter accumulation and yield attributes viz., number of pod plant-1 , 100 seed weight, biological yield, harvest index found superior by using Quizalofop ethyl @50 gm a.i /ha as post emergence than Pendimethalin @ 1.5 kg a.i /ha as pre-emergence, Two hand weedings at (20 & 40 DAS) and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1607 · show in text ↑
t0

“Urdbean (Vigna mungo L. Hepper)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quizalofop treatment was superior for biological yield, harvest index.

Taxon
UrdbeanVigna mungot0
Treatment
Quizalofop ethyl @50 gm a.i /ha as post emergencee0
Outcome
biological yield, harvest indexe0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant population, growth parameters viz., plant height, number of trifoliate leaves and dry matter accumulation and yield attributes viz., number of pod plant-1 , 100 seed weight, biological yield, harvest index found superior by using Quizalofop ethyl @50 gm a.i /ha as post emergence than Pendimethalin @ 1.5 kg a.i /ha as pre-emergence, Two hand weedings at (20 & 40 DAS) and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1607 · show in text ↑
t0

“Urdbean (Vigna mungo L. Hepper)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–136 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quizalofop treatment yielded net return of Rs. 40631.

Taxon
UrdbeanVigna mungot0
Outcome
returne0
Value
Rs. 40631e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment also fetched Rs. 40631 and 53753 net and gross return, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1609–1692 · show in text ↑
t0

“Urdbean (Vigna mungo L. Hepper)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–136 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quizalofop treatment yielded gross return of 53753.

Taxon
UrdbeanVigna mungot0
Outcome
returne0
Value
53753e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment also fetched Rs. 40631 and 53753 net and gross return, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1609–1692 · show in text ↑
t0

“Urdbean (Vigna mungo L. Hepper)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broad beds ranked highest for the previously listed crop parameters.

Taxon
UrdbeanVigna mungot0
Treatment
Broad bed method (30 cm)e0
Outcome
highest values of above parameterse0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
Ridge methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Broad bed method (30 cm) showed highest values of above parameters followed by Ridge method, Line sowing (30 cm), and Broadcast sowing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1730–1865 · show in text ↑
t0

“Urdbean (Vigna mungo L. Hepper)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Broad beds significantly reduced weed population.

Taxon
UrdbeanVigna mungot0
Outcome
weed populatione0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Apart from above it also bring significantly reduction in weed population and dry weight of weeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1866–1964 · show in text ↑
t0

“Urdbean (Vigna mungo L. Hepper)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Broad beds significantly reduced dry weight of weeds.

Taxon
UrdbeanVigna mungot0
Outcome
dry weight of weedse0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Apart from above it also bring significantly reduction in weed population and dry weight of weeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1866–1964 · show in text ↑
t0

“Urdbean (Vigna mungo L. Hepper)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–136 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest broad beds with quizalofop for weed control and maximum net return.

Taxon
urdbeanVigna mungoe0
Outcome
broad bed method in combination with Quizalofop ethyl @50 g a.i. / ha as post emergencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“broad bed method in combination with Quizalofop ethyl @50 g a.i. / ha as post emergence may be suggested for effective control of weeds in urdbean with maximum net return”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1971–2141 · show in text ↑

quizalofop-ethyl · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

quizalofop-ethyl · weed · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

transgenic · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.