Paper · 2004 · Peanut Science

Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Response to Cyclanilide and Prohexadione Calcium

D. L. Jordan; J. B. Beam; J. E. Lanier; et al.

10
claims
16
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract Excessive growth of Virginia market-type peanut affects row visibility and pod yield of peanut. Ten experiments were conducted from 2000 to 2002 in North Carolina to compare peanut response to cyclanilide and prohexadione calcium applied at 50% row closure followed by a repeat application 2 wk later. Cyclanilide and prohexadione calcium increased row visibility in all experiments. Main stem height was shorter at the end of the season when cyclanilide and prohexadione calcium were applied compared with non-treated peanut in all experiments except one. Prohexadione calcium improved row visibility compared with cyclanilide in three experiments and equaled cyclanilide in seven experiments. Main stem height was similar following application of cyclanilide and prohexadione calcium in eight of the 10 experiments. When pooled over experiments, pod yield ranged from 4210 to 4480 kg/ha and did not differ between non-treated peanut and peanut treated with either plant growth regulator. However, prohexadione calcium did increase pod yield of peanut compared with cyclanilide. Results indicate that cyclanilide is not as effective as prohexadione calcium in managing peanut vine growth because of inconsistent enhancement of row visibility and possible negative impacts on pod yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cyclanilide increased peanut row visibility in all experiments.

Treatment
Cyclanilidee0
Outcome
row visibilitye0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
all experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cyclanilide and prohexadione calcium increased row visibility in all experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 311–391 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prohexadione calcium increased peanut row visibility in all experiments.

Treatment
prohexadione calciume0
Outcome
row visibilitye0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
all experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cyclanilide and prohexadione calcium increased row visibility in all experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 311–391 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cyclanilide shortened peanut main stems at season end relative to untreated plants in all but one experiment.

Treatment
cyclanilidee0
Outcome
Main stem heighte0
Direction
shortere0
Qualifier
all experiments except onee0
Comparator
non-treated peanute0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Main stem height was shorter at the end of the season when cyclanilide and prohexadione calcium were applied compared with non-treated peanut in all experiments except one”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–564 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prohexadione calcium shortened peanut main stems at season end relative to untreated plants in all but one experiment.

Treatment
prohexadione calciume0
Outcome
Main stem heighte0
Direction
shortere0
Qualifier
all experiments except onee0
Comparator
non-treated peanute0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Main stem height was shorter at the end of the season when cyclanilide and prohexadione calcium were applied compared with non-treated peanut in all experiments except one”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–564 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prohexadione calcium improved peanut row visibility over cyclanilide in three experiments.

Treatment
Prohexadione calciume0
Outcome
row visibilitye0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
three experimentse0
Comparator
cyclanilidee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Prohexadione calcium improved row visibility compared with cyclanilide in three experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–657 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prohexadione calcium and cyclanilide gave equal peanut row visibility in seven experiments.

Treatment
Prohexadione calciume1
Outcome
row visibilitye1
Direction
equalede0
Qualifier
seven experimentse0
Comparator
cyclanilidee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“equaled cyclanilide in seven experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–702 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
e1

“Prohexadione calcium improved row visibility compared with cyclanilide in three experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–657 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut main stem height was similar after the two growth regulators in eight of ten experiments.

Treatment
cyclanilidee0
Outcome
Main stem heighte0
Direction
similare0
Qualifier
eight of the 10 experimentse0
Comparator
prohexadione calciume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Main stem height was similar following application of cyclanilide and prohexadione calcium in eight of the 10 experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–825 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut pod yield ranged from 4210 to 4480 kg/ha and did not differ between untreated and regulator treated plants.

Treatment
either plant growth regulatore0
Outcome
pod yielde0
Direction
did not differe0
Value
4210 to 4480 kg/hae0
Comparator
non-treated peanute0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pod yield ranged from 4210 to 4480 kg/ha and did not differ between non-treated peanut and peanut treated with either plant growth regulator”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–997 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prohexadione calcium increased peanut pod yield over cyclanilide.

Treatment
prohexadione calciume0
Outcome
pod yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
cyclanilidee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“prohexadione calcium did increase pod yield of peanut compared with cyclanilide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1087 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors judge cyclanilide less effective than prohexadione calcium for peanut vine growth management.

Treatment
cyclanilidee0
Outcome
managing peanut vine growthe0
Comparator
prohexadione calciume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cyclanilide is not as effective as prohexadione calcium in managing peanut vine growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1197 · show in text ↑

prohexadione · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

18 papers: 13 positive, 5 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

prohexadione · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

class · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 9 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.