Paper · 2002 · Environmental Entomology

Spatial and Temporal Dynamics of Colorado Potato Beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in Fields with Perimeter and Spatially Targeted Insecticides

Paul E. Blom; Shelby J. Fleischer; Zane Smilowitz

11
claims
29
verbatim quotes
44
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Concern over insecticide resistance has led to the suggestion of spatially variable within-field management of Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say). Here we compare L. decemlineata spatial and temporal dynamics, and potato yield, in fields treated with a narrow perimeter (5.5 m) of systemic imidacloprid supplemented with spatially targeted sprays to untreated fields and to fields where all rows received the systemic. The systemic targeted immigrating individuals which, having acquired the field through either flight or walking, first established themselves in the outer 5.5 m of the field. The perimeter treatment (≈25% of field area) reduced mean densities with no effect on timing of peak densities. Immigrating adults established similar spatial trends in both perimeter and untreated fields. Although trends in F1 larval densities have been shown to follow the patterns established by immigrating adults, trends in the F1 larval densities of the perimeter treatments diverged from adult patterns and developed highest densities in field centers. Immigrating adults had little to no spatial dependence in the covariance structure in any treatments. Spatial dependence in the covariance structure of F1 larval and F1 adult populations developed as density increased in both perimeter and untreated fields, with a tendency for increasing spatial dependence in perimeter fields, though this was not statistically significant. Comparing the perimeter to untreated fields, yields increased at a proportion that was higher than the proportion of land area treated, but remained significantly lower than the whole-field treatment. These results suggest that the perimeter tactic has promise as a site-specific resistance management program, but that refinement of border width is needed to optimize trade-offs among yield, quality, and long-term maintenance of susceptibility.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The perimeter treatment reduced mean Colorado potato beetle densities relative to untreated fields.

Treatment
narrow perimeter (5.5 m) of systemic imidaclopride0
Interactor
Colorado potato beetleLeptinotarsa decemlineatae1pest
Outcome
mean densitiese2
Direction
reducede2
Comparator
untreated fieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Leptinotarsa decemlineata
Leptinotarsa decemlineata · InteractorScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and potato yield, in fields treated with a narrow perimeter (5.5 m) of systemic imidacloprid supplemented with spatially targeted sprays to untreated fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–387 · show in text ↑
e1

“Concern over insecticide resistance has led to the suggestion of spatially variable within-field management of Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–166 · show in text ↑
e2

“The perimeter treatment (≈25% of field area) reduced mean densities with no effect on timing of peak densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–725 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The perimeter treatment had no effect on the timing of peak Colorado potato beetle densities.

Treatment
perimeter treatmente2
Interactor
Colorado potato beetleLeptinotarsa decemlineatae1pest
Outcome
timing of peak densitiese2
Direction
no effecte2
Comparator
untreated fieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Leptinotarsa decemlineata
Leptinotarsa decemlineata · InteractorScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and potato yield, in fields treated with a narrow perimeter (5.5 m) of systemic imidacloprid supplemented with spatially targeted sprays to untreated fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–387 · show in text ↑
e1

“Concern over insecticide resistance has led to the suggestion of spatially variable within-field management of Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–166 · show in text ↑
e2

“The perimeter treatment (≈25% of field area) reduced mean densities with no effect on timing of peak densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–725 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Immigrating Colorado potato beetle adults showed similar spatial trends in perimeter and untreated fields.

Organ / stage
Immigrating adultse3
Interactor
Colorado potato beetleLeptinotarsa decemlineatae1pest
Outcome
spatial trendse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Leptinotarsa decemlineata
Leptinotarsa decemlineata · InteractorScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and potato yield, in fields treated with a narrow perimeter (5.5 m) of systemic imidacloprid supplemented with spatially targeted sprays to untreated fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–387 · show in text ↑
e1

“Concern over insecticide resistance has led to the suggestion of spatially variable within-field management of Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–166 · show in text ↑
e3

“Immigrating adults established similar spatial trends in both perimeter and untreated fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–819 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F1 larval beetle densities in perimeter treatments diverged from adult patterns and were highest in field centers.

Organ / stage
F1 larvale4
Treatment
perimeter treatmentse4
Interactor
Colorado potato beetleLeptinotarsa decemlineatae1pest
Outcome
F1 larval densitiese4
Direction
divergede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Leptinotarsa decemlineata
Leptinotarsa decemlineata · InteractorScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and potato yield, in fields treated with a narrow perimeter (5.5 m) of systemic imidacloprid supplemented with spatially targeted sprays to untreated fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–387 · show in text ↑
e1

“Concern over insecticide resistance has led to the suggestion of spatially variable within-field management of Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–166 · show in text ↑
e4

“trends in the F1 larval densities of the perimeter treatments diverged from adult patterns and developed highest densities in field centers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1073 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Immigrating Colorado potato beetle adults had little to no spatial dependence in the covariance structure in any treatment.

Organ / stage
Immigrating adultse5
Interactor
Colorado potato beetleLeptinotarsa decemlineatae1pest
Outcome
spatial dependence in the covariance structuree5
Direction
little to noe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Leptinotarsa decemlineata
Leptinotarsa decemlineata · InteractorScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and potato yield, in fields treated with a narrow perimeter (5.5 m) of systemic imidacloprid supplemented with spatially targeted sprays to untreated fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–387 · show in text ↑
e1

“Concern over insecticide resistance has led to the suggestion of spatially variable within-field management of Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–166 · show in text ↑
e5

“Immigrating adults had little to no spatial dependence in the covariance structure in any treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1175 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spatial dependence in F1 larval and F1 adult beetle populations developed as density increased in both perimeter and untreated fields.

Organ / stage
F1 larval and F1 adult populationse6
Interactor
Colorado potato beetleLeptinotarsa decemlineatae1pest
Outcome
spatial dependence in the covariance structuree6
Direction
increasede6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Leptinotarsa decemlineata
Leptinotarsa decemlineata · InteractorScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and potato yield, in fields treated with a narrow perimeter (5.5 m) of systemic imidacloprid supplemented with spatially targeted sprays to untreated fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–387 · show in text ↑
e1

“Concern over insecticide resistance has led to the suggestion of spatially variable within-field management of Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–166 · show in text ↑
e6

“Spatial dependence in the covariance structure of F1 larval and F1 adult populations developed as density increased in both perimeter and untreated fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1331 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A tendency for increasing spatial dependence in perimeter fields was not statistically significant.

Treatment
perimeter fieldse7
Outcome
spatial dependencee7
Direction
increasinge7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and potato yield, in fields treated with a narrow perimeter (5.5 m) of systemic imidacloprid supplemented with spatially targeted sprays to untreated fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–387 · show in text ↑
e7

“with a tendency for increasing spatial dependence in perimeter fields, though this was not statistically significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1449 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yields in perimeter fields increased by a proportion higher than the proportion of land area treated, compared with untreated fields.

Treatment
perimetere2
Outcome
yieldse2
Direction
increasede2
Qualifier
at a proportion that was higher than the proportion of land area treatede2
Comparator
untreated fieldse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and potato yield, in fields treated with a narrow perimeter (5.5 m) of systemic imidacloprid supplemented with spatially targeted sprays to untreated fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–387 · show in text ↑
e2

“Comparing the perimeter to untreated fields, yields increased at a proportion that was higher than the proportion of land area treated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1451–1585 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yields with the perimeter treatment remained significantly lower than with whole-field treatment.

Treatment
perimetere2
Outcome
yieldse2
Direction
lowere3
Comparator
whole-field treatmente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and potato yield, in fields treated with a narrow perimeter (5.5 m) of systemic imidacloprid supplemented with spatially targeted sprays to untreated fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–387 · show in text ↑
e2

“Comparing the perimeter to untreated fields, yields increased at a proportion that was higher than the proportion of land area treated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1451–1585 · show in text ↑
e3

“but remained significantly lower than the whole-field treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1587–1650 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The perimeter tactic has promise as a site-specific resistance management program in potato.

Outcome
site-specific resistance management programe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and potato yield, in fields treated with a narrow perimeter (5.5 m) of systemic imidacloprid supplemented with spatially targeted sprays to untreated fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–387 · show in text ↑
e4

“These results suggest that the perimeter tactic has promise as a site-specific resistance management program”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1652–1760 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Border width of the perimeter treatment needs refinement to optimize trade-offs among yield, quality and susceptibility maintenance.

Outcome
refinement of border widthe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and potato yield, in fields treated with a narrow perimeter (5.5 m) of systemic imidacloprid supplemented with spatially targeted sprays to untreated fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–387 · show in text ↑
e5

“refinement of border width is needed to optimize trade-offs among yield, quality, and long-term maintenance of susceptibility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1771–1896 · show in text ↑

imidacloprid · Leptinotarsa decemlineata · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.