Paper · 2015 · Jordan Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Effects of Mulch and Sowing Depth on Yield and Yield Components of Rain-Fed Chickpea (Cicer arietinum .L)

Moslem Fetri; Mohammad-Eghbal Ghobadi; Mokhtar Ghobadi; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In order to study the effect of mulch on moisture maintaining in chickpea (var. ILC482) cultivation, a split plot experiment was conducted based on completely randomized complete block design with three replications. Main plots were sowing depth (4, 8 and 12 cm) and sub-plots were six moisture maintaining and supplying methods (including control= without mulch, corn stubble mulch, wheat stubble mulch, manure mulch, soil mulch and supplementary irrigation (ideal condition) in podding stage). The results showed that there was a significant difference among mulch treatments about their effects on plant height, total biomass, grain yield, number of grain per plant and 100- grains weight. In different sowing depth, significant differences in total biomass, grain yield, number of grain per plant, harvest index and 100- grains weight were depicted. Harvest index and number of grain per plant exhibited highly significant differences in response to soil moisture maintaining treatments and Interaction between mulch × sowing depth. Sowing depth of 12 cm allocated the least 100- grains weight but total biomass, grain yield and number of grain per plant were the highest. Sowing depth of 12 cm allocated the least 100- grains weight, but total biomass, grain yield and number of grain per plant were the highest and sowing depths of 4 and 8 cm allocated the highest value. Mulch treatments had total biomass, grain yield and harvest index more than control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch treatments differed significantly for plant height, biomass, grain yield, grains per plant, and grain weight.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
mulch treatmentse0
Outcome
plant height, total biomass, grain yield, number of grain per plant and 100- grains weighte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“there was a significant difference among mulch treatments about their effects on plant height, total biomass, grain yield, number of grain per plant and 100- grains weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–691 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing depths differed significantly for biomass, grain yield, grains per plant, harvest index, and grain weight.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
sowing depthe0
Outcome
total biomass, grain yield, number of grain per plant, harvest index and 100- grains weighte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 76–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“In different sowing depth, significant differences in total biomass, grain yield, number of grain per plant, harvest index and 100- grains weight were depicted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–852 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 12 cm sowing depth, 100-grain weight was lowest.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Sowing depth of 12 cme0
Outcome
100- grains weighte0
Direction
leaste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 76–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“Sowing depth of 12 cm allocated the least 100- grains weight but total biomass, grain yield and number of grain per plant were the highest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 12 cm sowing depth, biomass, grain yield, and grains per plant were highest.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Sowing depth of 12 cme0
Outcome
total biomass, grain yield and number of grain per plante0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 76–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“Sowing depth of 12 cm allocated the least 100- grains weight but total biomass, grain yield and number of grain per plant were the highest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch increased biomass, grain yield, and harvest index relative to control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Mulch treatmentse0
Outcome
total biomass, grain yield and harvest indexe0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 76–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“Mulch treatments had total biomass, grain yield and harvest index more than control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1461 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.