Paper · 2008 · Systematic Botany

Phylogenetic Relationships of Tribe Crotalarieae (Fabaceae) Inferred from DNA Sequences and Morphology

James S. Boatwright; Marianne M. le Roux; Michael Wink; et al.

10
claims
12
verbatim quotes
65
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Tribe Crotalarieae is a large and diverse group of papilionoid legumes that largely occur in Africa. A systematic study of generic relationships within the tribe was undertaken using nucleotide sequences from the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) of nuclear ribosomal DNA, the plastid gene rbcL, and morphological data. The Crotalarieae are supported strongly as monophyletic and sister to the tribe Genisteae. Lebeckia, Lotononis, and Wiborgia are all paraphyletic in the molecular analyses and morphological data support the division of Lebeckia into three more natural genera (one of which includes the monotypic North African Spartidium). Four major lineages were identified within the tribe based on sequence data: the “Cape” group, comprising Aspalathus, Lebeckia, Rafnia, Spartidium, and Wiborgia; the Lotononis group, comprising Lotononis pro parte, Pearsonia, Robynsiophyton, and Rothia; a group comprising Lotononis section Leptis, L. section Listia, and allies; and the Crotalaria group, comprising Bolusia, Crotalaria, and Lotononis hirsuta (Lotononis section Euchlora). Morphological analysis yields a similar topology, except that Lotononis is monophyletic if L. hirsuta were excluded. When the molecular and morphological data sets are combined, the same major clades are retrieved as in the molecular analysis, with the notable exception that Lotononis and Lebeckia senso stricto are supported as monophyletic. The results from this study have important implications for the classification of the tribe Crotalarieae and present an important step towards a natural and phylogenetic generic classification for the tribe.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crotalarieae are strongly supported as monophyletic and sister to Genisteae.

Taxon
CrotalarieaeCrotalarieaee0
Outcome
monophyletic and sister to the tribe Genisteaee0

Verbatim

e0

“The Crotalarieae are supported strongly as monophyletic and sister to the tribe Genisteae.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–419 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Molecular analyses find Lebeckia paraphyletic.

Taxon
LebeckiaLebeckiae0
Outcome
paraphyletice0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lebeckia
Lebeckia · TaxonBernard DUPONT from FRANCE · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lebeckia, Lotononis, and Wiborgia are all paraphyletic in the molecular analyses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–500 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Molecular analyses find Lotononis paraphyletic.

Taxon
LotononisLotononise0
Outcome
paraphyletice0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lotononis
Lotononis · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTony Rebelo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lebeckia, Lotononis, and Wiborgia are all paraphyletic in the molecular analyses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–500 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Molecular analyses find Wiborgia paraphyletic.

Taxon
WiborgiaWiborgiae0
Outcome
paraphyletice0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Wiborgia
Wiborgia · TaxonDwergenpaartje · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lebeckia, Lotononis, and Wiborgia are all paraphyletic in the molecular analyses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–500 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Morphological data support dividing Lebeckia into three more natural genera, including one with Spartidium.

Taxon
LebeckiaLebeckiae0
Outcome
division of Lebeckia into three more natural generae0
Qualifier
one of which includes the monotypic North African Spartidiume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lebeckia
Lebeckia · TaxonBernard DUPONT from FRANCE · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“morphological data support the division of Lebeckia into three more natural genera (one of which includes the monotypic North African Spartidium)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–650 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequence data identify four major lineages within Crotalarieae.

Taxon
CrotalarieaeCrotalarieaee1
Outcome
Four major lineagese0

Verbatim

e0

“Four major lineages were identified within the tribe based on sequence data: the “Cape” group, comprising Aspalathus, Lebeckia, Rafnia, Spartidium, and Wiborgia; the Lotononis group, comprising Lotononis pro parte, Pearsonia, Robynsiophyton, and Rothia; a group comprising Lotononis section Leptis, L. section Listia, and allies; and the Crotalaria group, comprising Bolusia, Crotalaria, and Lotononis hirsuta (Lotononis section Euchlora).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–1091 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tribe Crotalarieae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Morphological analysis yields a similar topology, with Lotononis monophyletic if L. hirsuta is excluded.

Taxon
LotononisLotononise0
Outcome
monophyletice0
Qualifier
if L. hirsuta were excludede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lotononis
Lotononis · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTony Rebelo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Morphological analysis yields a similar topology, except that Lotononis is monophyletic if L. hirsuta were excluded.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1208 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining molecular and morphological data retrieves the same major clades as molecular analysis.

Taxon
CrotalarieaeCrotalarieaee1
Outcome
same major clades are retrievede0
Comparator
molecular analysise0

Verbatim

e0

“When the molecular and morphological data sets are combined, the same major clades are retrieved as in the molecular analysis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1334 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tribe Crotalarieae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined molecular and morphological data support Lotononis as monophyletic.

Taxon
LotononisLotononise0
Outcome
monophyletice0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lotononis
Lotononis · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTony Rebelo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with the notable exception that Lotononis and Lebeckia senso stricto are supported as monophyletic.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1435 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined molecular and morphological data support Lebeckia senso stricto as monophyletic.

Taxon
Lebeckia senso strictoe0
Outcome
monophyletice0

Verbatim

e0

“with the notable exception that Lotononis and Lebeckia senso stricto are supported as monophyletic.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1435 · show in text ↑