Paper · 2012 · American-Asian-Journal of agricultural & environmental sciences/American-Eurasian journal of agricultural & environmental sciences

Effect of different tillage methods on weed populations in a tomato cropping system under arid conditions

Saeed Mohammadi; Shahram Mohseni Niari; Mohammad Mehdi Rashidi

6
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

3 Abstract: Filed experiments were carried out at the Agricultural Research Site of Tehran Province, Varamin, Iran to study the effect of different tillage methods on weed populations in a tomato cropping system under arid conditions during 2007 and 2008 growing seasons. Tillage treatments were moldboard plow + two passes of disk harrow as conventional tillage (CT); one pass of disk harrow as minimum tillage (MT) and zero tillage activity as no-tillage (NT). Two indices of weed populations, i.e. number of weeds per square meter (NUMW) and dry mass of weeds per square meter (DRMW) were determined for different tillage treatments. Statistical results of study indicated that tillage methods significantly (P 0.05) affected both indices of weed populations. The lowest values of NUMW (16.6 m ) and DRMW (19.5 g m ) were recorded in the 22 CT treatment, while the highest values of NUMW (21.5 m ) and DRMW (29.0 g m ) were noted in the 22 NT treatment. Results also showed that tillage method affected both indices of weed populations in the order of CT < MT < NT. Therefore, tillage operations were beneficial and useful in reducing both indices of weed populations in the tomato cropping system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage gave the lowest weed number per square meter (NUMW) in tomato compared with no-tillage.

Treatment
CTe2
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
NUMWe2
Direction
loweste2
Value
16.6 me2
Comparator
NTe3
Setting
Varamin, Irane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Filed experiments were carried out at the Agricultural Research Site of Tehran Province, Varamin, Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–114 · show in text ↑
e1

“tillage methods significantly (P 0.05) affected both indices of weed populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–761 · show in text ↑
e2

“The lowest values of NUMW (16.6 m ) and DRMW (19.5 g m ) were recorded in the 22 CT treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–856 · show in text ↑
e3

“while the highest values of NUMW (21.5 m ) and DRMW (29.0 g m ) were noted in the 22 NT treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–955 · show in text ↑
t0

“weed populations in a tomato cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage gave the lowest dry mass of weeds (DRMW) in tomato compared with no-tillage.

Treatment
CTe2
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
DRMWe2
Direction
loweste2
Value
19.5 g me2
Comparator
NTe3
Setting
Varamin, Irane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Filed experiments were carried out at the Agricultural Research Site of Tehran Province, Varamin, Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–114 · show in text ↑
e1

“tillage methods significantly (P 0.05) affected both indices of weed populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–761 · show in text ↑
e2

“The lowest values of NUMW (16.6 m ) and DRMW (19.5 g m ) were recorded in the 22 CT treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–856 · show in text ↑
e3

“while the highest values of NUMW (21.5 m ) and DRMW (29.0 g m ) were noted in the 22 NT treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–955 · show in text ↑
t0

“weed populations in a tomato cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage gave the highest weed number per square meter (NUMW) in tomato.

Treatment
NTe3
Interactor
weedt0weed
Outcome
NUMWe3
Direction
higheste3
Value
21.5 me3
Comparator
CTe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The lowest values of NUMW (16.6 m ) and DRMW (19.5 g m ) were recorded in the 22 CT treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–856 · show in text ↑
e3

“while the highest values of NUMW (21.5 m ) and DRMW (29.0 g m ) were noted in the 22 NT treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–955 · show in text ↑
t0

“weed populations in a tomato cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage gave the highest dry mass of weeds (DRMW) in tomato.

Treatment
NTe3
Interactor
weedt0weed
Outcome
DRMWe3
Direction
higheste3
Value
29.0 g me3
Comparator
CTe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The lowest values of NUMW (16.6 m ) and DRMW (19.5 g m ) were recorded in the 22 CT treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–856 · show in text ↑
e3

“while the highest values of NUMW (21.5 m ) and DRMW (29.0 g m ) were noted in the 22 NT treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–955 · show in text ↑
t0

“weed populations in a tomato cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage method affected both weed population indices in the order CT < MT < NT.

Treatment
tillage methode4
Interactor
weede4weed
Outcome
both indices of weed populationse4
Direction
in the order of CT < MT < NTe4
Comparator
MTe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“tillage methods significantly (P 0.05) affected both indices of weed populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–761 · show in text ↑
e4

“Results also showed that tillage method affected both indices of weed populations in the order of CT < MT < NT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1067 · show in text ↑
t0

“weed populations in a tomato cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–83 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage operations are beneficial for reducing weed populations in tomato, according to the authors.

Interactor
weede5weed
Outcome
reducing both indices of weed populationse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Therefore, tillage operations were beneficial and useful in reducing both indices of weed populations in the tomato cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1200 · show in text ↑

tillage · weed · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.