Abstract
Investigations were carried out on tomato plants to evaluate the efficacy of neem and groundnut cakes in comparison with aldicarb on plant growth parameters, penetration, development and population build up of M. incognita juveniles. Growth response of plants to neem and aldicarb was better than groundnut cake and unamended control. In the early period of plant growth, neem and aldicarb treatments were at par but at the later phase, neem superseded aldicarb. Similarly, groundnut showed improvement over control which were earlier at par. In root and soil populations, least nematode number was recorded in aldicarb followed by neem, groundnut and control. Different treatments showed differential rates of development with fastest in control followed by groundnut, aldicarb and neem. Treatments also affected fecundity of the females and hatching of eggs.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Neem improved tomato growth more than groundnut cake or unamended control.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume1 - Treatment
- neeme0
- Outcome
- Growth response of plantse0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- groundnut cake and unamended controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Growth response of plants to neem and aldicarb was better than groundnut cake and unamended control”
e1“tomato plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Aldicarb improved tomato growth more than groundnut cake or unamended control.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
- Treatment
- aldicarbe0
- Outcome
- Growth response of plantse0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- groundnut cake and unamended controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Growth response of plants to neem and aldicarb was better than groundnut cake and unamended control”
e1“tomato plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Neem and aldicarb gave comparable early growth, but neem surpassed aldicarb later.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
- Treatment
- neeme0
- Outcome
- plant growthe0
- Direction
- supersedede0
- Comparator
- aldicarbe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In the early period of plant growth, neem and aldicarb treatments were at par but at the later phase, neem superseded aldicarb”
e1“tomato plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Groundnut cake improved growth over control after an initially comparable period.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
- Treatment
- groundnute0
- Outcome
- improvemente0
- Direction
- improvemente0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“groundnut showed improvement over control which were earlier at par”
e1“tomato plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Aldicarb yielded the fewest root and soil nematodes, followed by neem, groundnut and control.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume2
- Treatment
- aldicarbe0
- Interactor
- M. incognitae1pest
- Outcome
- nematode numbere0
- Direction
- leaste0
- Comparator
- neem, groundnut and controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In root and soil populations, least nematode number was recorded in aldicarb followed by neem, groundnut and control”
e1“M. incognita juveniles”
e2“tomato plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Nematode development was fastest in control, followed by groundnut, aldicarb and neem.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume2
- Interactor
- M. incognitae1pest
- Outcome
- rates of developmente0
- Direction
- fasteste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Different treatments showed differential rates of development with fastest in control followed by groundnut, aldicarb and neem”
e1“M. incognita juveniles”
e2“tomato plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatments affected female nematode fecundity and egg hatching.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume2
- Interactor
- M. incognitae1pest
- Outcome
- fecundity of the females and hatching of eggse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Treatments also affected fecundity of the females and hatching of eggs”
e1“M. incognita juveniles”
e2“tomato plants”
The same questions in other papers
aldicarb · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
aldicarb · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →botanical · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
202 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
287 papers more in this group
See all 291 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.