Paper · 2013

Cryopreservation of In Vitro Grown Shoot Tips of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)

Amira Rashid Sallam; Mahdia Gabr; Ghada Abd El-Moneim Hegazi; et al.

5
claims
7
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Cryopreservation has been recognized as a practical and efficient tool for long-term storage of vegetatively propagated plants. This study was conducted to examine the effect of three cryopreservation methods (vitrification, encapsulation/vitrification and encapsulation/dehydration) and four different storage periods (0, 1, 3 and 6 months) on the survival and recovery percentages of excised in vitro- and virus-free shoot tips of two potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivars, namely Spunta and Lady Rosetta. In vitro produced plantlets were pretreated with high sucrose concentrations and cold temperature (10°C), before the application of different cryopreservation methods. After pretreatments, samples were rapidly cooled in liquid nitrogen and stored at a temperature of -80°C. Cryopreserved shoot tips, after thawing for 90 seconds at 38-40°C in a water bath, were directly planted on regeneration medium for recovery. The highest survival (73.44%) as well as recovery (53.13%), of cryopreserved shoot tip explants of both potato cultivars, was observed with encapsulation/vitrification method. Increasing the storage period decreased both survival and recovery percentages of cryopreserved shoot tips. Cultivar Lady Rosetta showed superiority over Spunta, it recorded higher mean percentages of survival and recovery with encapsulation/vitrification method. Thus, this study demonstrated that encapsulation/vitrification method appears promising for cryopreservation of in vitro stored shoot tips for both cultivars of potato.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Encapsulation/vitrification produced the highest shoot-tip survival, 73.44%.

Organ / stage
shoot tip explantse0
Treatment
encapsulation/vitrification methode0
Outcome
survivale0
Direction
higheste0
Value
73.44%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest survival (73.44%) as well as recovery (53.13%), of cryopreserved shoot tip explants of both potato cultivars, was observed with encapsulation/vitrification method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Encapsulation/vitrification produced the highest shoot-tip recovery, 53.13%.

Treatment
encapsulation/vitrification methode0
Outcome
recoverye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
53.13%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest survival (73.44%) as well as recovery (53.13%), of cryopreserved shoot tip explants of both potato cultivars, was observed with encapsulation/vitrification method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1100 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer storage decreased potato shoot-tip survival and recovery.

Treatment
storage periode0
Outcome
survival and recovery percentagese0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the storage period decreased both survival and recovery percentages of cryopreserved shoot tips”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1208 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lady Rosetta had higher survival and recovery than Spunta under encapsulation/vitrification.

Material
Lady Rosettae0
Treatment
encapsulation/vitrification methode0
Outcome
survival and recoverye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Spuntae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivar Lady Rosetta showed superiority over Spunta, it recorded higher mean percentages of survival and recovery with encapsulation/vitrification method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1364 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–55 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors consider encapsulation/vitrification promising for in vitro potato shoot-tip storage.

Treatment
encapsulation/vitrification methode0
Outcome
cryopreservation of in vitro stored shoot tipse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“encapsulation/vitrification method appears promising for cryopreservation of in vitro stored shoot tips for both cultivars of potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1401–1533 · show in text ↑

in vitro · survival · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.