Abstract
Availability of green fodder is one of the most serious problems for livestock particularly in winter season. The aim of this research was to evaluate dual purpose wheat utilized for forage and grain yield grown under different seed rate (S) and nitrogen (N) levels. Wheat variety Bakhtawar92 was sown at Agricultural University, Peshawar for forage and grain production using 3 N rates (80, 120, 160 kg ha -1 ), 2 S rates (100, 150 kg ha -1 ) and 3 cuttings (no cut, cut 75 days after planting, cut 90 days after planting). Forage dry matter yield increased with delay in cutting from 75 days to 90 days after sowing and delayed days to heading, whereas grain yield decreased with delayed cutting. No cut produced tallest plants with highest grain yield. Seed rate of 150 kg ha -1 and maximum N (160 kg ha -1 ) produced tallest plants, maximum forage dry matter and biological yield, however, days to heading was delayed. Grain yield was higher from 100 kg ha -1 seed rate and 120 kg N ha -1 . Similar trend was observed in productive tillers m -2 , number of grains spike -1 and 1000grains weight and perform better in the no cut plots, 100 kg ha -1 seed rate and 120 kg N ha -1 . It may be concluded that seed rate of 100 kg ha -1 and 120 kg N ha -1 and no cut appeared to be optimum for grain yield of wheat. Dry forage yield of 204 kg roughly equal to 800 kg -1 green forage may be obtained with a reduction of 300 kg in grain and 440 kg in biological yield ha -1 .
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Later cutting increased forage dry matter yield and delayed heading relative to earlier cutting.
- Taxon
- WHEAT
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- 90 days after sowinge0
- Outcome
- Forage dry matter yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- 75 dayse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Forage dry matter yield increased with delay in cutting from 75 days to 90 days after sowing and delayed days to heading”
t0“WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Later cutting delayed heading.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 90 days after sowinge0
- Outcome
- days to headinge0
- Direction
- delayede0
- Comparator
- 75 dayse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Forage dry matter yield increased with delay in cutting from 75 days to 90 days after sowing and delayed days to heading”
t0“WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Delayed cutting decreased grain yield.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- delayed cuttinge0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“grain yield decreased with delayed cutting”
t0“WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Uncut wheat was tallest and had the highest grain yield.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- No cute0
- Outcome
- tallest plants with highest grain yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“No cut produced tallest plants with highest grain yield”
t0“WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
The 150 kg ha -1 seed rate produced the tallest plants, maximum forage dry matter and biological yield, and delayed heading.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Seed rate of 150 kg ha -1e0
- Outcome
- tallest plants, maximum forage dry matter and biological yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Seed rate of 150 kg ha -1 and maximum N (160 kg ha -1 ) produced tallest plants, maximum forage dry matter and biological yield, however, days to heading was delayed”
t0“WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
The 160 kg ha -1 nitrogen rate produced the tallest plants, maximum forage dry matter and biological yield.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 160 kg ha -1e0
- Outcome
- tallest plants, maximum forage dry matter and biological yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“maximum N (160 kg ha -1 ) produced tallest plants, maximum forage dry matter and biological yield”
t0“WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Heading was delayed under the 150 kg ha -1 seed rate and 160 kg ha -1 nitrogen rate.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Seed rate of 150 kg ha -1 and maximum N (160 kg ha -1 )e0
- Outcome
- days to headinge0
- Direction
- delayede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Seed rate of 150 kg ha -1 and maximum N (160 kg ha -1 ) produced tallest plants, maximum forage dry matter and biological yield, however, days to heading was delayed”
t0“WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield was higher with a 100 kg ha -1 seed rate.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 100 kg ha -1 seed ratee0
- Outcome
- Grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Grain yield was higher from 100 kg ha -1 seed rate and 120 kg N ha -1”
t0“WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield was higher with 120 kg N ha -1.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 120 kg N ha -1e0
- Outcome
- Grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Grain yield was higher from 100 kg ha -1 seed rate and 120 kg N ha -1”
t0“WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Productive tillers, grains per spike and thousand-grain weight performed better in uncut plots at 100 kg ha -1 seed rate and 120 kg N ha -1.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- no cut plots, 100 kg ha -1 seed rate and 120 kg N ha -1e0
- Outcome
- productive tillers m -2 , number of grains spike -1 and 1000grains weighte0
- Direction
- bettere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Similar trend was observed in productive tillers m -2 , number of grains spike -1 and 1000grains weight and perform better in the no cut plots, 100 kg ha -1 seed rate and 120 kg N ha -1”
t0“WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors identified 100 kg ha -1 seed rate, 120 kg N ha -1 and no cutting as optimal for grain yield.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- seed rate of 100 kg ha -1 and 120 kg N ha -1 and no cute0
- Outcome
- optimum for grain yielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“seed rate of 100 kg ha -1 and 120 kg N ha -1 and no cut appeared to be optimum for grain yield of wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Dry forage yield reached 204 kg, roughly equivalent to 800 kg -1 green forage.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- Dry forage yielde0
- Value
- 204 kge0
- Qualifier
- 800 kg -1 green foragee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Dry forage yield of 204 kg roughly equal to 800 kg -1 green forage”
t0“WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Obtaining forage reduced grain yield by 300 kg.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Dry forage yield of 204 kge0
- Outcome
- graine0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 300 kge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Dry forage yield of 204 kg roughly equal to 800 kg -1 green forage may be obtained with a reduction of 300 kg in grain and 440 kg in biological yield ha -1”
t0“WHEAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Obtaining forage reduced biological yield by 440 kg ha -1.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Dry forage yield of 204 kge0
- Outcome
- biological yielde0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 440 kge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Dry forage yield of 204 kg roughly equal to 800 kg -1 green forage may be obtained with a reduction of 300 kg in grain and 440 kg in biological yield ha -1”
t0“WHEAT”
The same questions in other papers
pruning · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
89 papers more in this group
See all 93 papers →density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
375 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
494 papers more in this group
See all 498 papers →nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- positive
- positive
2,057 papers more in this group
See all 2,061 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.