Paper · 2013 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Assessing genetic diversity of promising wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) lines using microsatellite markers linked with salinity tolerance

Somaye Sardouie Nasab; Ghasem Mohammadi‐Nejad; Babak Nakhoda

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Narrow genetic variability may lead to genetic vulnerability of field crops against biotic and abiotic stresses which can cause yield reduction. In this study a set of 37 wheat microsatellite markers linked with identified QTLs for salinity tolerance were used for the assessment of genetic diversity for salinity in 30 promising lines of hexaploid bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). A total of 438 alleles were detected with an average allele number of 11.84 per locus using 37 microsatellite markers. The number of alleles per locus ranged from two to twenty, the maximum number of alleles was observed at Xgwm312. Gene diversity statistic for 37 microsatellite loci was varied from 0.66 to 0.94 and also polymorphic information content value was varied from 0.64 to 0.93 for Xgwm445 and Xgwm312 respectively. Result showed Xgwm312 SSR marker with the highest PIC value was distinguished as the best marker for genetic diversity analysis to improve of salinity tolerance. Obtained dendrogram by UPGMA method categorized genotypes in to 3 different groups, which had different reaction to salinity. A wide range of genomic diversity was observed among all the genotypes. Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) also confirmed this pattern of genetic diversity, proving them can be use as the prime candidates in order to improve of salinity tolerance in breeding programs of wheat. The present study also indicates that microsatellite markers permit the fast and high throughput fingerprinting of numbers of genotypes from a germplasm collection in order to assess genetic diversity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thirty-seven markers detected 438 alleles, averaging 11.84 per locus.

Outcome
alleles were detectede0
Value
438 allelese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A total of 438 alleles were detected with an average allele number of 11.84 per locus using 37 microsatellite markers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–502 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–383 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The average allele count was 11.84 per locus.

Outcome
average allele numbere0
Value
11.84 per locuse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an average allele number of 11.84 per locus using 37 microsatellite markers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–502 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–383 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Allele count ranged from two to twenty per locus.

Outcome
number of alleles per locuse0
Value
two to twentye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of alleles per locus ranged from two to twenty”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–561 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–383 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Xgwm312 had the maximum allele count.

Gene
Xgwm312e0
Outcome
maximum number of allelese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum number of alleles was observed at Xgwm312”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–616 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–383 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gene diversity at 37 loci ranged from 0.66 to 0.94.

Outcome
Gene diversity statistice0
Value
0.66 to 0.94e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gene diversity statistic for 37 microsatellite loci was varied from 0.66 to 0.94”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–698 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–383 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polymorphic information content ranged from 0.64 to 0.93.

Outcome
polymorphic information content valuee0
Value
0.64 to 0.93e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“polymorphic information content value was varied from 0.64 to 0.93 for Xgwm445 and Xgwm312 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–811 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–383 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Xgwm312 had the highest PIC value and was identified as the best diversity marker for salinity-tolerance improvement.

Gene
Xgwm312e0
Outcome
best marker for genetic diversity analysise0
Comparator
highest PIC valuee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Xgwm312 SSR marker with the highest PIC value was distinguished as the best marker for genetic diversity analysis to improve of salinity tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–973 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–383 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UPGMA separated the genotypes into three groups with different salinity responses.

Outcome
3 different groupse0
Value
3 different groupse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Obtained dendrogram by UPGMA method categorized genotypes in to 3 different groups, which had different reaction to salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1099 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–383 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A wide range of genomic diversity occurred among the genotypes.

Outcome
wide range of genomic diversitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A wide range of genomic diversity was observed among all the genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1171 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–383 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCoA confirmed the genetic diversity pattern.

Outcome
confirmed this pattern of genetic diversitye0
Comparator
this pattern of genetic diversitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) also confirmed this pattern of genetic diversity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1259 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–383 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The genotypes were proposed as breeding candidates for salinity tolerance.

Outcome
prime candidates in order to improve of salinity tolerancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“prime candidates in order to improve of salinity tolerance in breeding programs of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1380 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microsatellite markers were judged suitable for fast, high-throughput germplasm fingerprinting.

Outcome
fast and high throughput fingerprintinge0
Comparator
numbers of genotypes from a germplasm collectione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“microsatellite markers permit the fast and high throughput fingerprinting of numbers of genotypes from a germplasm collection in order to assess genetic diversity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1420–1582 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–383 · show in text ↑