Paper · 2015 · Jordan Journal of Biological Sciences

Evaluating the Genetic Relatedness within Lupinus Pilosus L. Species Based on RAPD Analysis

Ibrahim M. Al Rawashdeh; Nasab Q. Al Rawashdeh

4
claims
6
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Nine Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) primers showing polymorphic bands were used to determine the genetic relatedness among and within single individual plants of Lupinus pilosus and used for the construction of the dendrogram and the similarity matrix. A total of 1112 bands were obtained, 219 of which were polymorphic. Similarity values among the studied single individuals of Lupinus pilosus ranged from 0.450 to 0.02. The cluster analysis obtained by Unweighted Pair-Group Method with arithmetic averages (UPGMA) grouped the tested individuals into three clusters. A genetic variation was found within Lupinus pilosus based on RAPD markers. The variability emphasis the presence of genetic diversity within Lupinus pilosus species.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The RAPD primers yielded 1112 bands, including 219 polymorphic bands.

Taxon
Lupinus pilosusLupinus pilosuse1
Outcome
bands were obtainede0
Value
1112 bandse0
Qualifier
219 of which were polymorphice0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lupinus pilosus
Lupinus pilosus · TaxonZachi Evenor · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A total of 1112 bands were obtained, 219 of which were polymorphic.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–329 · show in text ↑
e1

“Lupinus pilosus”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 42–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Similarity values among Lupinus pilosus individuals ranged from 0.450 to 0.02.

Taxon
Lupinus pilosusLupinus pilosuse0
Outcome
Similarity valuese0
Value
0.450 to 0.02e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lupinus pilosus
Lupinus pilosus · TaxonZachi Evenor · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similarity values among the studied single individuals of Lupinus pilosus ranged from 0.450 to 0.02.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–430 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UPGMA cluster analysis grouped the tested individuals into three clusters.

Taxon
Lupinus Pilosus L.t0
Outcome
grouped the tested individuals into three clusterse0
Value
three clusterse0

Verbatim

e0

“The cluster analysis obtained by Unweighted Pair-Group Method with arithmetic averages (UPGMA) grouped the tested individuals into three clusters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–577 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lupinus Pilosus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RAPD markers revealed genetic variation within Lupinus pilosus.

Taxon
Lupinus pilosusLupinus pilosuse0
Outcome
genetic variatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lupinus pilosus
Lupinus pilosus · TaxonZachi Evenor · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A genetic variation was found within Lupinus pilosus based on RAPD markers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–653 · show in text ↑