Paper · 2013

10.7251/AGSY1303559K EFFECT OF SOWING DATE ON SPECIES COMPOSITION OF INSECT PESTS ON WINTER TRITICALE DURING THE SPRING AND SUMMER IN BULGARIA

Hristina Krasteva; V. Krumov; O.E. Karadjova

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of sowing date of winter trit icale on the species composition of insect pests on the crop during the spring and summer growth stages was evaluated in Kostinbrod (Bulgaria) for the period 2009 - 2013. Forty-two damaging insect species belonging to six orders: Orthoptera, Thysanoptera, Hemiptera, Coleoptera, Hymenoptera and Diptera, were identified. In early spring (during the growth stages of tillering and stem elongation) the most damaging species for early winter sowings (sown during the last decades of September) were stem boring pests. Their complex included adults of Hemiptera, and larvae of Coleoptera and Diptera, among wh ich Opomyza florum and Phorbia fumigata were the most important species. Damages caused by O. florum were prevalent in early sowings, while those caused by P. fumigata were more pronounced in late trit icale sowings (sown in the second and third decade of October). In late spring and early summer (during the growth stages of heading ƒ ripening of winter trit icale) the most damaging insects were sap-sucking species from the orders Thysanoptera and Hemiptera, and family Cecidomyiidae (Diptera). The wheat thrips Haplothrips tritici was the most abundant. Twenty five species of Hemiptera from the families Aphididae (3 species), Aphrophoridae (1 species), Cicadellidae (9 species), Delphacidae (1 species), Miridae (5 species), Pentatomidae (4 species) and Scutelleridae (2 species) were found to damage the leaves, spike and grains of winter triticale. The dominant species were Aelia rostrata and Eurygaster maura. Insect pests from the genera Dolerus and Cephus were of insignificant importance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forty-two damaging insect species in six orders were identified.

Taxon
WINTER TRITICALE×Triticosecalet0
Outcome
damaging insect speciese0
Value
Forty-twoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Forty-two damaging insect species belonging to six orders: Orthoptera, Thysanoptera, Hemiptera, Coleoptera, Hymenoptera and Diptera, were identified.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–361 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER TRITICALE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem boring pests were most damaging in early spring on early sown triticale.

Taxon
WINTER TRITICALE×Triticosecalet0
Interactor
stem boring pestse0pest
Outcome
most damaging speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the most damaging species for early winter sowings (sown during the last decades of September) were stem boring pests.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–556 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER TRITICALE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

O. florum damage predominated in early sowings.

Taxon
WINTER TRITICALE×Triticosecalet0
Treatment
early sowingse0
Interactor
O. florumOpomyza florume0pest
Outcome
Damages caused by O. florume0
Direction
prevalente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Opomyza florum
Opomyza florum · InteractorHectonichus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Damages caused by O. florum were prevalent in early sowings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–780 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER TRITICALE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. fumigata damage was more pronounced in late sowings.

Taxon
WINTER TRITICALE×Triticosecalet0
Treatment
late trit icale sowingse0
Interactor
P. fumigataPhorbia fumigatae0pest
Outcome
those caused by P. fumigatae0
Direction
more pronouncede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phorbia fumigata
Phorbia fumigata · InteractorJames K. Lindsey · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“those caused by P. fumigata were more pronounced in late trit icale sowings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–863 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER TRITICALE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sap sucking insects and Cecidomyiidae were most damaging in late spring and early summer.

Taxon
winter trit icale×Triticosecalee0
Interactor
sap-sucking speciese0pest
Outcome
most damaging insectse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In late spring and early summer (during the growth stages of heading ƒ ripening of winter trit icale) the most damaging insects were sap-sucking species from the orders Thysanoptera and Hemiptera, and family Cecidomyiidae (Diptera).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1146 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Haplothrips tritici was the most abundant pest.

Taxon
WINTER TRITICALE×Triticosecalet0
Interactor
Haplothrips triticiHaplothrips triticie0pest
Outcome
most abundante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The wheat thrips Haplothrips tritici was the most abundant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1206 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER TRITICALE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twenty five Hemiptera species damaged triticale leaves, spikes and grains.

Taxon
winter triticale×Triticosecalee0
Interactor
HemipteraHemipterae0pest
Outcome
damage the leaves, spike and grainse0
Value
Twenty five speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Twenty five species of Hemiptera from the families Aphididae (3 species), Aphrophoridae (1 species), Cicadellidae (9 species), Delphacidae (1 species), Miridae (5 species), Pentatomidae (4 species) and Scutelleridae (2 species) were found to damage the leaves, spike and grains of winter triticale.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1505 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aelia rostrata and Eurygaster maura were dominant species.

Taxon
WINTER TRITICALE×Triticosecalet0
Outcome
dominant speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The dominant species were Aelia rostrata and Eurygaster maura.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1506–1568 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER TRITICALE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dolerus and Cephus pests were of insignificant importance.

Taxon
WINTER TRITICALE×Triticosecalet0
Outcome
insignificant importancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Insect pests from the genera Dolerus and Cephus were of insignificant importance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1569–1650 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER TRITICALE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑