Paper · 2013

CROP STAND AND PHENOLOGY OF WHEAT AS AFFECTED BY INTEGRATED USE OF ORGANIC AND INORGANIC FERTILIZERS

Sajjad Khan; S. K. Khalil; Zahir Shah

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Integrated use of organic and inorganic fertilizers play a vital role in the establishment of good crop stand and phenology. In this regard a field experiment was conducted at Livestock Research and Development Station, Surezai, Peshawar, for two crops seasons 2010-11 and 2011-12. The experiment was laid out in randomized complete block design with four replications. Experimental treatments consisted of poultry manure (2, 4 and 6 ton ha -1 ) farm yard manure (2, 4 and 6 ton ha -1 ) and nitrogen (60 and 90 kg N ha -1 ). Eighteen different combinations of organic and inorganic fertilizers were applied to wheat crop. Poultry manure, farm yard manure and nitrogen significantly affected, leaves tiller -1 , plant height, spike length and days to maturity. Higher leaves tiller -1 , plant height and more days to maturity was observed with application of 6 tons poultry manure, 6 tons farm yard manure ha 1 and 60 kg N ha -1 , while poor crop stand and phonological characteristics were observed in control plots. Good crop stand and phenological characteristics were observed with integrated application of organic and inorganic fertilizers. It is concluded that a combine dose of 6 ton poultry manure, 6 tons farm yard manure ha -1 and 90 kg N ha -1 is recommended for good crop stand and phenology in wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure, farm yard manure and nitrogen significantly affected leaves per tiller, height, spike length and maturity time.

Treatment
Poultry manure, farm yard manure and nitrogene0
Outcome
leaves tiller -1 , plant height, spike length and days to maturitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“Poultry manure, farm yard manure and nitrogen significantly affected, leaves tiller -1 , plant height, spike length and days to maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–758 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The stated manure and nitrogen combination gave higher leaves per tiller and height and more days to maturity.

Treatment
6 tons poultry manure, 6 tons farm yard manure ha 1 and 60 kg N ha -1e0
Outcome
leaves tiller -1 , plant height and more days to maturitye0
Direction
Highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“Higher leaves tiller -1 , plant height and more days to maturity was observed with application of 6 tons poultry manure, 6 tons farm yard manure ha 1 and 60 kg N ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–927 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control plots showed poor crop stand and phenological characteristics.

Treatment
control plotse0
Outcome
poor crop stand and phonological characteristicse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“poor crop stand and phonological characteristics were observed in control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1015 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated organic and inorganic fertilizer application produced good crop stand and phenological characteristics.

Treatment
integrated application of organic and inorganic fertilizerse0
Outcome
Good crop stand and phenological characteristicse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“Good crop stand and phenological characteristics were observed with integrated application of organic and inorganic fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1144 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend the combined manure and nitrogen dose for good wheat stand and phenology.

Treatment
6 ton poultry manure, 6 tons farm yard manure ha -1 and 90 kg N ha -1e0
Outcome
good crop stand and phenologye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“6 ton poultry manure, 6 tons farm yard manure ha -1 and 90 kg N ha -1 is recommended for good crop stand and phenology in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1312 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 12 positive, 7 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Split N application increased 1000-kernel weight at two site-years.

    Timing and Level of Nitrogen Fertility Effects on Spring Wheat Yield in Eastern Canada · 1994 · compared with application of all the fertilizer N at seeding

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Split N application increased 1000-kernel weight at two site-years.

    Timing and Level of Nitrogen Fertility Effects on Spring Wheat Yield in Eastern Canada · 1994 · compared with application of all the fertilizer N at seeding

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.