Paper · 2014

Effect of Drought Stress on Crop Yield and Yield Components of Cantaloupe in the Arid Lands of Iran

Saeed Mohammadi; Mohammad Mehdi Rashidi; Mohammad Rahmani; et al.

9
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted to study the effect of drought stress on crop yield and yield components of cantaloupe in the arid lands of Iran during 2004 and 2005 growing seasons. Four irrigation treatments based on 10, 30, 50 and 70% available water deficit (AWD) were applied to cantaloupe in the two consecutive growing seasons. Irrigation treatments were designed to induce a range of drought stress from emergence to harvest. Yield components, i.e. number of plants per hectare (NPPH), number of fruits per plant (NFPP), fruit weight (FW) and fruit thickness (FT) were measured and consequently crop yield (CY) was determined for all treatments. The statistical results of study showed that drought stress significantly (P 0.01) affected CY, NPPH, NFPP and FW, but there was no significant difference in FT. The maximum values of CY (29.10 t ha ) and NPPH (8255) were obtained in case of 10% AWD treatment and the minimum values of CY 1 (17.26 t ha ) and NPPH (4645) were recorded in case of 70% AWD treatment. Moreover, the maximum values 1 of NFPP (3.77) and FW (1520 g) were obtained in case of 30% AWD treatment and the minimum values of NFPP (2.03) and FW (1030 g) were recorded in case of 70% AWD treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CY reached a maximum of 29.10 t ha at 10% AWD.

Treatment
10% AWDe0
Outcome
CYe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
29.10 t hae0
Comparator
70% AWD treatmente0
Setting
Irant1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cantaloupe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–73 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum values of CY (29.10 t ha ) and NPPH (8255) were obtained in case of 10% AWD treatment and the minimum values of CY 1 (17.26 t ha ) and NPPH (4645) were recorded in case of 70% AWD treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–1019 · show in text ↑
t1

“Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CY reached a minimum of 17.26 t ha at 70% AWD.

Treatment
70% AWD treatmente0
Outcome
CYe0
Direction
minimume0
Value
17.26 t hae0
Comparator
10% AWDe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cantaloupe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–73 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum values of CY (29.10 t ha ) and NPPH (8255) were obtained in case of 10% AWD treatment and the minimum values of CY 1 (17.26 t ha ) and NPPH (4645) were recorded in case of 70% AWD treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–1019 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPPH reached a maximum of 8255 at 10% AWD.

Treatment
10% AWDe0
Outcome
NPPHe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
8255e0
Comparator
70% AWD treatmente0
Setting
Irant1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cantaloupe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–73 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum values of CY (29.10 t ha ) and NPPH (8255) were obtained in case of 10% AWD treatment and the minimum values of CY 1 (17.26 t ha ) and NPPH (4645) were recorded in case of 70% AWD treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–1019 · show in text ↑
t1

“Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPPH reached a minimum of 4645 at 70% AWD.

Treatment
70% AWD treatmente0
Outcome
NPPHe0
Direction
minimume0
Value
4645e0
Comparator
10% AWDe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cantaloupe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–73 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum values of CY (29.10 t ha ) and NPPH (8255) were obtained in case of 10% AWD treatment and the minimum values of CY 1 (17.26 t ha ) and NPPH (4645) were recorded in case of 70% AWD treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–1019 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NFPP reached a maximum of 3.77 at 30% AWD.

Treatment
30% AWDe0
Outcome
NFPPe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
3.77e0
Comparator
70% AWD treatmente0
Setting
Irant1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cantaloupe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–73 · show in text ↑
e0

“Moreover, the maximum values 1 of NFPP (3.77) and FW (1520 g) were obtained in case of 30% AWD treatment and the minimum values of NFPP (2.03) and FW (1030 g) were recorded in case of 70% AWD treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1222 · show in text ↑
t1

“Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NFPP reached a minimum of 2.03 at 70% AWD.

Treatment
70% AWD treatmente0
Outcome
NFPPe0
Direction
minimume0
Value
2.03e0
Comparator
30% AWDe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cantaloupe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–73 · show in text ↑
e0

“Moreover, the maximum values 1 of NFPP (3.77) and FW (1520 g) were obtained in case of 30% AWD treatment and the minimum values of NFPP (2.03) and FW (1030 g) were recorded in case of 70% AWD treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1222 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FW reached a maximum of 1520 g at 30% AWD.

Treatment
30% AWDe0
Outcome
FWe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1520 ge0
Comparator
70% AWD treatmente0
Setting
Irant1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cantaloupe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–73 · show in text ↑
e0

“Moreover, the maximum values 1 of NFPP (3.77) and FW (1520 g) were obtained in case of 30% AWD treatment and the minimum values of NFPP (2.03) and FW (1030 g) were recorded in case of 70% AWD treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1222 · show in text ↑
t1

“Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FW reached a minimum of 1030 g at 70% AWD.

Treatment
70% AWD treatmente0
Outcome
FWe0
Direction
minimume0
Value
1030 ge0
Comparator
30% AWDe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cantaloupe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–73 · show in text ↑
e0

“Moreover, the maximum values 1 of NFPP (3.77) and FW (1520 g) were obtained in case of 30% AWD treatment and the minimum values of NFPP (2.03) and FW (1030 g) were recorded in case of 70% AWD treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1222 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit thickness did not differ significantly across drought treatments.

Outcome
FTe0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cantaloupe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–73 · show in text ↑
e0

“there was no significant difference in FT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–815 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results differ

16 papers: 3 positive, 13 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.