Paper · 2011 · JOURNAL OF WEED SCIENCE RESEARCH

Economic weed management options in winter rice.

M. A. Al-Mamun; Rakiba Shultana; M. K. A. Bhuiyan; et al.

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Due to labor shortage chemical weed control becomes a priority by time. An experiment was carried out to find out an effective and economic herbicide to control weeds in the Agronomy Farm of Bangladesh Rice Research Institute, Gazipur, during December 2008 to June 2009 in winter season. Surjamoni and BRRI dhan-29 were used as rice cultivars. Weed control treatments were assigned using three rates of Becolor 5G (butachlor), Bouncer 10WP (pyrazosulfuron ethyl) and Becofit 500EC (Pretilachlor). Visual observation indicates that these herbicides were not toxic to rice plants. Paspalum distichum was the dominating weed species in the experimental site. Weed control efficiency ranged (WCE) from 42 to 84%. Above 80% WCE was obtained by Becolor 5G @ 30 kg ha -1 , Bouncer 10WP @ 150g ha -1 and Becofit 500EC @ 1.20 L ha -1 , respectively. The highest grain yield (6.96 t ha -1 ) was obtained from Surjamoni when treated with Bouncer 10WP @ 150g ha -1 which was 49% higher than control. BRRI dhan29 produced also the highest grain yield when treated with same treatment which was 37% higher than control. In terms of profitability of rice production, application of Bouncer 10WP @ 150g ha -1 gave highest gross return and gross margin than other weed control treatments. The highest (2.77) benefit cost ratio (BCR) of Bouncer 10WP @ 150g ha -1 suggested that it could be an alternative weed control option for profitable rice production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tested herbicides showed no visible toxicity to rice.

Treatment
these herbicidese0
Outcome
not toxic to rice plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Visual observation indicates that these herbicides were not toxic to rice plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–577 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paspalum distichum dominated the site weeds.

Interactor
Paspalum distichumPaspalum distichume0weed
Outcome
dominating weed speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Paspalum distichum
Paspalum distichum · InteractorJohn Robert McPherson · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Paspalum distichum was the dominating weed species in the experimental site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–654 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–342 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control efficiency across treatments ranged from 42 to 84%.

Outcome
Weed control efficiencye0
Value
42 to 84%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed control efficiency ranged (WCE) from 42 to 84%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–707 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–342 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Becolor 5G at 30 kg ha -1 achieved above 80% weed control efficiency.

Treatment
Becolor 5G @ 30 kg ha -1e0
Outcome
WCEe0
Value
Above 80%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Above 80% WCE was obtained by Becolor 5G @ 30 kg ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–763 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–342 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bouncer 10WP at 150g ha -1 achieved above 80% weed control efficiency.

Treatment
Bouncer 10WP @ 150g ha -1e0
Outcome
WCEe0
Value
Above 80%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Above 80% WCE was obtained by Becolor 5G @ 30 kg ha -1 , Bouncer 10WP @ 150g ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–791 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–342 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Becofit 500EC at 1.20 L ha -1 achieved above 80% weed control efficiency.

Treatment
Becofit 500EC @ 1.20 L ha -1e0
Outcome
WCEe0
Value
Above 80%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Above 80% WCE was obtained by Becolor 5G @ 30 kg ha -1 , Bouncer 10WP @ 150g ha -1 and Becofit 500EC @ 1.20 L ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–824 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–342 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surjamoni with Bouncer 10WP at 150g ha -1 yielded 6.96 t ha -1, 49% above control.

Material
Surjamonie0
Treatment
Bouncer 10WP @ 150g ha -1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
6.96 t ha -1e0
Qualifier
49%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield (6.96 t ha -1 ) was obtained from Surjamoni when treated with Bouncer 10WP @ 150g ha -1 which was 49% higher than control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–986 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–342 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bouncer 10WP at 150g ha -1 gave the highest gross return and gross margin.

Treatment
Bouncer 10WP @ 150g ha -1e0
Outcome
gross return and gross margine0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
other weed control treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of Bouncer 10WP @ 150g ha -1 gave highest gross return and gross margin than other weed control treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1270 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–342 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bouncer 10WP at 150g ha -1 had the highest benefit cost ratio, 2.77.

Treatment
Bouncer 10WP @ 150g ha -1e0
Outcome
benefit cost ratio (BCR)e0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.77e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest (2.77) benefit cost ratio (BCR) of Bouncer 10WP @ 150g ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1344 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–342 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend Bouncer 10WP at 150g ha -1 as an alternative for profitable rice weed control.

Treatment
Bouncer 10WP @ 150g ha -1e0
Outcome
alternative weed control option for profitable rice productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bouncer 10WP @ 150g ha -1 suggested that it could be an alternative weed control option for profitable rice production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1319–1437 · show in text ↑