Paper · 2011

Investigation of genetic relationships among trifoliata oranges and their hybrid relatives based on ISSR markers

Aydın Uzun; Osman Gülşen; Übeyit Seday; et al.

9
claims
11
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Diversity and genetic relationships were investigated in 19 trifoliata oranges ((Poncirus trifoliata (L.) Raf) and their 27 hybrids including 20 citranges (P. trifoliata X Citrus sinensis), five citrumelos (P. trifoliata X C. paradisi) and two citremons (P. trifoliata X C. limon) based on inter- simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers. Twelve ISSR primers produced a total of 120 fragments and 82 of them were polymorphic (68%). The unweighted pair group method arithmetic average (UPGMA) analysis as assessed with ISSR data demonstrated that the accessions had a similarity range from 0.67 to 1.00. In the dendrogram there were three main groups including trifoliata, citremon and citrange- citrumelo groups. The trifoliata orange, citrange, citrumelo and citremon groups were separated. The citrumelo group was nested in the citrange branch. Genetic diversity among the trifoliata accessions was low probably because of their mutation origin. However all trifoliata accessions were distinguished except for two of them. The citrange group had higher polymorphism than the other trifoliata hybrids. Our study indicated that ISSR markers were useful to determine genetic diversity of related citrus groups such as trifoliata oranges and their intergeneric hybrids.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ISSR primers produced 120 fragments, of which 82 were polymorphic.

Taxon
trifoliata orangest0
Outcome
120 fragmentse0
Value
120 fragmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“Twelve ISSR primers produced a total of 120 fragments and 82 of them were polymorphic (68%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–428 · show in text ↑
t0

“trifoliata oranges”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ISSR similarity among the accessions ranged from 0.67 to 1.00.

Taxon
trifoliata orangest0
Outcome
similarity rangee0
Value
0.67 to 1.00e0

Verbatim

e0

“The unweighted pair group method arithmetic average (UPGMA) analysis as assessed with ISSR data demonstrated that the accessions had a similarity range from 0.67 to 1.00.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–599 · show in text ↑
t0

“trifoliata oranges”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The dendrogram formed three main groups.

Taxon
trifoliatae0
Outcome
three main groupse0
Value
three main groupse0

Verbatim

e0

“In the dendrogram there were three main groups including trifoliata, citremon and citrange- citrumelo groups.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–709 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trifoliata orange, citrange, citrumelo and citremon groups were separated.

Taxon
trifoliata orangee0
Outcome
groups were separatede0

Verbatim

e0

“The trifoliata orange, citrange, citrumelo and citremon groups were separated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–788 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genetic diversity among trifoliata accessions was low.

Taxon
trifoliatae0
Outcome
Genetic diversitye0
Direction
lowe0

Verbatim

e0

“Genetic diversity among the trifoliata accessions was low probably because of their mutation origin.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–944 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All but two trifoliata accessions were distinguishable.

Taxon
trifoliatae0
Outcome
accessions were distinguishede0
Qualifier
except for two of theme0

Verbatim

e0

“However all trifoliata accessions were distinguished except for two of them.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1021 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Citrange had higher polymorphism than other trifoliata hybrids.

Taxon
citrangee0
Outcome
polymorphisme0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other trifoliata hybridse0

Verbatim

e0

“The citrange group had higher polymorphism than the other trifoliata hybrids.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1099 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ISSR markers were useful for determining diversity among related citrus groups.

Taxon
trifoliata orangese0
Outcome
genetic diversitye0
Value
usefule0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Our study indicated that ISSR markers were useful to determine genetic diversity of related citrus groups such as trifoliata oranges and their intergeneric hybrids.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1264 · show in text ↑